From: NM on
On 6 Aug, 15:26, kkm <k...(a)w3.to> wrote:
> In article <l6adnbA0AuJGvsbRnZ2dnUVZ8tadn...(a)bt.com>, Brimstone
> <brimstone520-n...(a)yahoo.co.uk> writes
>
>
>
>
>
> >"Paul" <23...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:8c0l3bF5t6U1(a)mid.individual.net...
> >> On 05/08/2010 21:13, Brimstone wrote:
>
> >>> "Paul" <23...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:8c0k8tF13jU1(a)mid.individual.net...
> >>>> On 05/08/2010 21:09, Brimstone wrote:
>
> >>>>> "martin" <use...(a)etiqa.co.uk> wrote in message
> >>>>>news:4c5b16e2$0$12155$fa0fcedb(a)news.zen.co.uk...
> >>>>>> On 05/08/2010 20:13, Brimstone wrote:
> >>>>>>> I can't remember the last time I saw such an over the top reaction.
> >>>>>>> It's
> >>>>>>> a wonderful example of how some public servants think they're the
> >>>>>>> masters and we are to do their bidding.
>
> >>>>>>> There is a video on the website.
>
> >>>>>>>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1300608/Policemen-suspended-
> >smash-grab-raid-disabled-mans-Range-Rover.html
>
> >>>>>>> "Two policemen were suspended after a disabled pensioner claimed he
> >>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>> left terrified by officers who smashed his car window after
> >>>>>>> catching him
> >>>>>>> driving without a seatbelt.
>
> >>>>>>> When stroke victim Robert Whatley, 70, was pulled over in his Range
> >>>>>>> Rover, he expected a brief discussion with the officers.
>
> >>>>>> Hang on a sec!
>
> >>>>>> "Officers tried to issue him with a fixed penalty notice but Mr
> >>>>>> Whatley drove off.
>
> >>>>>> Two Gwent police officers followed him along eight miles of country
> >>>>>> lanes for 17 minutes before trying to stop the £60,000 Range Rover
> >>>>>> with a stinger device.
>
> >>>>>> But Mr Whatley pulled over again and waited for them to approach.
> >>>>>> He was later charged with a series of motoring offences."
>
> >>>>>>> But he claims he was forced to cover his face and was showered with
> >>>>>>> glass as one officer jumped on to the bonnet and kicked his
> >>>>>>> windscreen
> >>>>>>> while another repeatedly attacked the window with a baton.
>
> >>>>>> Serves the fucker right!
>
> >>>>>> He suffered a couple of broken windows after fleeing from the police.
> >>>>>> Why didn't you post this information in the first place. If he'd
> >>>>>> stopped then all he might have had was a "discussion".
>
> >>>>> Did you miss the bit where he said that he thought the matter was
> >>>>> concluded and do you think wrecking his car was justified?
>
> >>>>> If so, why do you suppose they coppers concerned have been removed from
> >>>>> operations?
>
> >>>> So - you drive for 17 mins and think the police have their blues and
> >>>> twos on - 'to escort you home'
>
> >>>> what planet are you on?
>
> >>> Perhaps you're accustomed to dealing with the police on a daily basis
> >>> and are totally familiar with their way of doing things. Obviously this
> >>> chap isn't.
>
> >> A 'retired businessman' with a 60k car with personal number plates must
> >> know what blues and twos are...shurely...
>
> >Are you trying to suggest that smashing his car up and dragging him out of
> >the car in the manner they did was a proportional response to not wearing a
> >seatbelt?
>
> But arguably a proportional response to knocking down a policeman with
> your motor vehicle whilst he is examining the passenger side of your
> vehicle.
>
> To quote from the original article:
>
> "But when an officer went round to the passenger side, the car lurched
> forward and he was knocked over."
>
> --
> K.

No charges were brought therefore this cannot be serious, seems like
the old duffer got a bit confused after dealing with the uniformed
louts. For sure he would have faced charges if it really happened as
said in the Daily Wail.
From: Adrian on
The Peeler <peelingthe(a)invalid.admin> gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying:

>>>>> Practicing the discus - in a gym? Was he throwing or catching?

>>>>Ever seen a cricket net? That kind of thing. In Sweden, they can't
>>>>exactly rely on the weather being good enough to practice outside.

>>> There's not much point throwing a discus if you can't see how far it
>>> goes, is there?

>>Yes.

> So what is the point? If it just bounces off the net you don't know if
> you're a good thrower or a useless one?

<points up>
What's the point of a cricket net? Or anything similar?
From: NM on
On 6 Aug, 15:42, "GT" <a...(a)b.c> wrote:
> "Chelsea Tractor Man" <mr.c.trac...(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in messagenews:un1k9j8pxzoh.9fgss52xwp89.dlg(a)40tude.net...
>
>
>
> > On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:54:01 +0100, GT wrote:
>
> >>> as in the other post, his RR will almost certainly be the same as my LR.
> >>> Stays locked.
>
> >> Fair enough - they'll need to smash the windows and jump on the bonnet
> >> like
> >> gorillas then!!
>
> > I suspect they are trained to go in fast, after all the average person who
> > fails to stop is going to be trouble. Put yourself in the coppers
> > position,
> > this old gaffer in a *Range Rover* (plenty of villans drive them) has
> > driven off mid interview. Is he carrying drugs? A firearm? Just because he
> > is 70 does not been he cannot be an armed criminal or a madman like that
> > bloke who recently shot and blinded a copper in the Lake District for no
> > rational reason at all.
> > He was being followed by a car with blue lights, (the idea of a police
> > escort is ridiculous) even if he thought it nothing to do with him (even
> > though he had just been speaking to the coppers) he should have pulled
> > over
> > to let it through.
>
> I agree with all but the last part - he should have pulled over if the
> police car was anywhere near him, but it wasn't.

Where in the video was there a place to pull over? He pulled over at
the first shown stopping place.
From: bod on
Adrian wrote:
> The Peeler <peelingthe(a)invalid.admin> gurgled happily, sounding much like
> they were saying:
>
>>>>>> Practicing the discus - in a gym? Was he throwing or catching?
>
>>>>> Ever seen a cricket net? That kind of thing. In Sweden, they can't
>>>>> exactly rely on the weather being good enough to practice outside.
>
>>>> There's not much point throwing a discus if you can't see how far it
>>>> goes, is there?
>
>>> Yes.
>
>> So what is the point? If it just bounces off the net you don't know if
>> you're a good thrower or a useless one?
>
> <points up>
> What's the point of a cricket net? Or anything similar?
>
>

There are no points on a cricket net :)

Bod
From: The Peeler on
On 6 Aug 2010 16:06:23 GMT, Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>The Peeler <peelingthe(a)invalid.admin> gurgled happily, sounding much like
>they were saying:
>
>>>>>> Practicing the discus - in a gym? Was he throwing or catching?
>
>>>>>Ever seen a cricket net? That kind of thing. In Sweden, they can't
>>>>>exactly rely on the weather being good enough to practice outside.
>
>>>> There's not much point throwing a discus if you can't see how far it
>>>> goes, is there?
>
>>>Yes.
>
>> So what is the point? If it just bounces off the net you don't know if
>> you're a good thrower or a useless one?
>
><points up>
>What's the point of a cricket net? Or anything similar?

<points down>
To stop people getting hit by cricket balls. Duh.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Prev: Road Casualties Q1 2010
Next: Nexen tyres