From: Steve O on


"Mike Ross" <mike(a)corestore.org> wrote in message
news:uafo56l59u8loj7pn4hhjkk4ki1j1d266p(a)4ax.com...
> On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:31:18 GMT, Periander <ulm@.4rubbish.britwar.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>>NM <nik.morgan(a)mac.com> wrote in
>>news:e2a782d3-1828-4688-b568-cf7edb3e6476(a)l20g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:
>>
>>> On 6 Aug, 16:40, Periander <ulm@.4rubbish.britwar.co.uk> wrote:
>>>> Mike Ross <m...(a)corestore.org> wrote
>>>> innews:8q6o5611tl7ejd8lesudp8gdhqbu8l6u57(a)4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Having said that, the guy DID stop immediately when an officer in
>>>> > front of him indicated he should stop
>>>>
>>>> No he stopped when a police officer managed to deploy a Stinger in
>>>> front of him and there wasn't room to get past it. Not quite the same
>>>> thing.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Periander
>>>
>>> Him stopping and the stinger deployment ahead of him have yet to be
>>> shown as connected events, probably the cops in front waved him down
>>> and the stinger was incidental, possibly not even seen by him given
>>> his confused state, certainly the stinger did not stop him.
>>
>>I never said it did, I said that he stopped when a Stinger was deployed
>>in front of him in a position where he couldn't avoid it. That is
>>factually accurate. As for his "confused state" I suspect that he wasn't
>>all that confused when he drove into a police officer in his haste to
>>make good his escape.
>
> There's little information to suggest he was a hardened and desperate man
> willing to drive into a police officer to 'make good his escape' (for
> sufficiently small values of 'escape!'). More likely he forgot to put the
> bloody
> thing in park, or became flustered and trod on the wrong pedal. If you
> watch the
> video, after he does stop the car starts rolling back, which suggests some
> issues with having proper control. He quite possibly didn't even know he
> had hit
> the officer.
>
> Mike
> --
> http://www.corestore.org
> 'As I walk along these shores
> I am the history within'

From: joe on
Periander wrote:

> "GT" <a(a)b.c> wrote in news:4c5c21a6$0$30171$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com:
>
> > "Periander" <ulm@.4rubbish.britwar.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:Xns9DCC9F005B076ulmbritwarcouk(a)69.16.176.253...
> >> boltar2003(a)boltar.world wrote in
> news:i3h60e$evu$1(a)speranza.aioe.org:
> > >
> >>> On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 14:21:42 GMT
> >>> Periander <ulm@.4rubbish.britwar.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > > Oh and if you persist in your ill founded belief I'd advert
> > > > > your attention to "Roadcraft" the standard police (and now
> > > > > all emergency vehicle) textbook on the subject and of course
> > > > > the ACPO TPAC training materials. Alternatively join the
> > > > > police and in due course take a response or advanced driving
> > > > > course.
> > > >
> >>> Or better yet don't bother - just go on a track day course and
> learn >>> about real car control, not the antiquated garbage you find
> in Road >>> Craft.
> > >
> >> Yes, drivng around in circles teaches you a lot of skills
> >> transferrable to the real world. Idiot.
> >
> > Like roundabouts, you mean? Or junctions? Or corners?
>
> Oh I see, on a track you have roundabouts where you give way to
> oncoming traffic? Next you'll be telling us that the track has
> pedestrians crossing without looking, cyclists overtaking on the
> inside, junctions controlled by traffic lights, oncoming traffic ...
>
> ... you do a lot of reverse parking do you on a track, or perhaps you
> have idiots reversing from thier drives and garages out in front of
> you without looking ... lollypop ladies spring out at you perhaps?
>
>
> Yes, tracks are great for learner drivers who wish to learn the
> system of car control but that's where it ends. If you believe
> otherwise I refer you to my previous comment - you're an idiot.

Unfortunately, you must be the idiot if you think extra driving in
conditions that are different to normal, are a waste of time.
riding in race conditions have greatly improved my riding.
--

From: martin on
On 06/08/2010 17:41, NM wrote:
> On 6 Aug, 17:31, Periander<ulm@.4rubbish.britwar.co.uk> wrote:

>> I never said it did, I said that he stopped when a Stinger was deployed
>> in front of him in a position where he couldn't avoid it. That is
>> factually accurate. As for his "confused state" I suspect that he wasn't
>> all that confused when he drove into a police officer in his haste to
>> make good his escape.

> If he did why was he not charged? seems like that is a bit of
> hyperbole.

Not really, that's a standby charge in case all else fails. Someone I
know got done for that for driving off from a stop. But the drink
driving charge was brought in front of the mags. Similar here, he got
done for the various charged and the incidental ones got dropped.
From: Mike Ross on
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 17:24:07 GMT, Periander <ulm@.4rubbish.britwar.co.uk> wrote:

>Mike Ross <mike(a)corestore.org> wrote in
>news:uafo56l59u8loj7pn4hhjkk4ki1j1d266p(a)4ax.com:
>
>>
>> There's little information to suggest he was a hardened and desperate
>> man willing to drive into a police officer to 'make good his escape'
>> (for sufficiently small values of 'escape!'). More likely he forgot to
>> put the bloody thing in park, or became flustered and trod on the
>> wrong pedal.
>
>For 17 minutes?

If you hadn't snipped so carelessly everyone would see that I posted the above
in response to your "I suspect that he wasn't all that confused when he drove
into a police officer in his haste to make good his escape."

In other words, I was refering to him allegedly knocking over an officer, not to
the subsequent following him. I've already made it clear that I have no idea
what was going through his head when he didn't stop, but I'm not buying his
'escort' line.

>> If you watch the video, after he does stop the car starts
>> rolling back, which suggests some issues with having proper control.
>> He quite possibly didn't even know he had hit the officer.
>
>Hehehe ... so you're saying that he's unfit to be a driver?

Quite possibly yes. Doesn't mean he deserves to have his car trashed.

I don't know if he was banned, but he should probably be required to retake his
test! Can a beak order that without ordering a ban?

>On a slightly more serious note, the full video is available (or was) on
>"Police stop" - a TV show. Overall he he didn't display any evidence of not
>knowing what he was doing.

Beyond the inexplicable failure to stop!

Mike
--
http://www.corestore.org
'As I walk along these shores
I am the history within'
From: Mike Ross on
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 22:56:33 +0100, "Steve O" <nospamhere(a)thanks.com> wrote:


(Steve wrote nothing!)


>"Mike Ross" <mike(a)corestore.org> wrote in message
>news:qv8o56lr19ckt8d6h15ncfoh6fhmvrjavl(a)4ax.com...
>> On 6 Aug 2010 14:58:06 GMT, Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Mike Ross <mike(a)corestore.org> gurgled happily, sounding much like they
>>>were saying:
>>>
>>>> And, they KNEW they were dealing with a very elderly chap. Now there are
>>>> some elderly chaps who are complete bastards, can be very aggressive,
>>>> sure. Some were serious hard cases in their younger days, no doubt. But
>>>> still, he was 70, they knew this, and I haven't heard anything to
>>>> suggest he was aggresive.
>>>
>>>Apart from the fact that 70 is a long way from "very elderly", do you
>>>think that the acceptable standard of driving for the "very elderly"
>>>should be somehow lowered far enough to include such massive lapses of
>>>observation and judgement?
>>
>> No. And don't put words in my mouth; I never suggested such a thing. In
>> fact I
>> said I didn't know what the guy was thinking when he didn't stop. 70 is
>> getting
>> on, and my comments were about how the police dealt with him when he DID
>> stop!
>>
>> Mike
>> --
>> http://www.corestore.org
>> 'As I walk along these shores
>> I am the history within'

You seem to be having posting issues, Steve - a bunch of followups with no
actual text from you!

Mike
--
http://www.corestore.org
'As I walk along these shores
I am the history within'
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
Prev: Road Casualties Q1 2010
Next: Nexen tyres