From: Feral on
D Walford wrote:
> On 16/05/2010 1:44 PM, Feral wrote:
>
>> ps: You might explain Threshold Braking to Daz (especially in the wet).
>> He wouldn't believe it's better than stamping on the stop pedal (as he
>> stated as "basic").
>>
>
> Once again you ignore the point about what difference disengaging the
> clutch makes to braking whatever method you use.
> If you have an explanation as to why you think it makes a difference FFS
> tell us what that is.

Unlock your closed mind and you may start to see the
complexities of the many different circumstances that could
occur, should you *suddenly* find you have no clutch.

Nah, never happen, roads straight, dry, level and plenty of time.

FFS

<flick you too Daz>

--
Take Care. ~~
Feral Al ( @..@)
(\- :-P -/)
((.>__oo__<.))
^^^ % ^^^
From: Noddy on

"jonz" <fj40(a)deisel.com> wrote in message
news:4befa4a0$1(a)dnews.tpgi.com.au...

> nup....very true. cocksuckers convention, no less......suck it up
> cockbreath.

You're such a retard that I'm almost embarrassed for you.

Almost.

--
Regards,
Noddy.


From: D Walford on
On 16/05/2010 5:49 PM, Feral wrote:
> D Walford wrote:
>> On 16/05/2010 1:44 PM, Feral wrote:
>>
>>> ps: You might explain Threshold Braking to Daz (especially in the wet).
>>> He wouldn't believe it's better than stamping on the stop pedal (as he
>>> stated as "basic").
>>>
>>
>> Once again you ignore the point about what difference disengaging the
>> clutch makes to braking whatever method you use.
>> If you have an explanation as to why you think it makes a difference FFS
>> tell us what that is.
>
> Unlock your closed mind and you may start to see the complexities of the
> many different circumstances that could occur, should you *suddenly*
> find you have no clutch.
>
> Nah, never happen, roads straight, dry, level and plenty of time.

Why can't you just answer the question.
My mind is open and waiting for your explanation but to date you haven't
offered any, all you seem to be interested in is your constant personal
attacks on anyone who disagrees with you, it would be a lot less painful
to simply answer the question.


Daryl
From: Noddy on

"D Walford" <dwalford(a)internode.on.net> wrote in message
news:4befd43d$0$8801$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...

> Why can't you just answer the question.

Because he's caught between a rock and a hard place.

He either has to agree with you and admit what you're saying is correct
which would make him look like a complete tool, or he has to disagree with
you by coming up with ridiculous bullshit which would make him look like a
complete tool.

The textbook Oz scenario in fact. You can't win :)

> My mind is open and waiting for your explanation but to date you haven't
> offered any, all you seem to be interested in is your constant personal
> attacks on anyone who disagrees with you, it would be a lot less painful
> to simply answer the question.

Good luck with that.

Personally I think if he genuinely thought he was right we'd have heard his
reasons as to why some time ago as he's usually not backward in coming
forward with theories. The fact that he hasn't this time suggests that he
realises he's painted himself into a corner and it'll be some time before
the paint is dry, so he's just going to keep his fingers in his ears and
sing the "la-la" song.

What a tool :)

--
Regards,
Noddy.





From: Noddy on

"Athol" <athol_SPIT_SPAM(a)idl.net.au> wrote in message
news:1274063639.180001(a)idlwebserver.idl.com.au...

> LOL. His assumption that it is a small minority begs the question of
> whether he thinks that it is the small minority of pink slip places
> that are dodgy, or the small minority of people who make use of those
> dodgy places...

Like every other comment he's made in this thread thus far, it's not exactly
clear what he means.

> I'd suggest that around 90% of pink slip places will turn a blind eye
> for a minor fault on a regular customer's vehicle on the understanding
> that the fault will be rectified within a few days or weeks (eg if the
> parts are on order and wouldn't arrive in time for the rego renewal).

There'd be a fair few places down here like that as well.

> I'm really not able to make a reliable estimate on the number of
> genuinely dodgy pink slip places. It could be as low as 1% or as high
> as 20%, but by the very nature of what they're up to, detection and
> hence estimation of frequency is always going to be difficult.

Indeed, which goes even further to make a mockery of the annual inspection
process in my opinion.

> I would estimate, however, that dodgy places would do more pink slips
> than the average. That's not saying that places that do more than
> average are all dodgy, but that dodgy places will attract turnover
> simply because people know that they are "easy".

Absolutely.

--
Regards,
Noddy.


First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Prev: Just one little bearing...
Next: ping oz