From: Dan----.- on
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 22:30:21 +1000, Atheist Chaplain PCM code reading
says:


>> --
>> Regards
>> Dan.
>>
>>
> his dads botched vasectomy ??


Only if masturbation had a sense of humour that wouldn't of happened. :-p




--
Regards
Dan
From: OzOne on
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:26:58 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote:

>
><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message
>news:373va5d72g3ohidokiejc1g7jfqvkecs6r(a)4ax.com...
>
>> Yeah..Nice line Nod....Fact is..You once had a CAMS licence...You no
>> longer have one!
>>
>> Despite claiming that you "have" one.
>
>Nice pedantics :)

Pedantics....Tell that to the copper that pulls you over with an
expired driving licence





OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 13:01:01 +1000, "Atheist Chaplain"
<abused(a)cia.gov> wrote:


>actually to be more correct I have absolutely NO faith in you, Noddy makes
>mistakes and bullshits with the best of them, he just doesn't believe his
>own publicity like you do.

Yeah...Nod lies and knows it....Good that you can see that.





OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: Feral on
user(a)domain.invalid wrote:

> or maybe the old Morris and Indian valves over there > in the corner
> the spray would be way to $ and a quick machine would be easy for a
> scrounger like you

were those three sharp stabs in the stomach I felt ?

I've gotta do, what I've gotta do. I have this limiter that
holds me back. :-(

--
Take Care. ~~
Feral Al ( @..@)
(\- :-( -/)
((.>__oo__<.))
^^^ % ^^^
From: OzOne on
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:59:13 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote:

>
><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message
>news:6e3va59vi062bf22ia69pidgl5vtg3dhu5(a)4ax.com...
>
>> What description?
>> You mean the one that was apparently attached to a Special Tuning head
>> that according to you had the inlets as part of the head?
>
>That'd be the one.
>
>> Funny init that Special tuning supplied a two piece inlet manifold to
>> suit that head!
>
>Did they?

Yeah, they did.
>
>Odd considering that the only carbs you needed a manifold for was anything
>*other* than a Weber DCOE.

Actually a manifold was required for both twin and single DCOE weber
setups on the 8 port
>
>> I even quoted the part no.
>
>You did indeed. What was that lucky number again?

C/AHT507
>
>> Odd that you didn't reply to that post!?
>> One you could ignore and get away with was it?
>
>But I *did* reply to that post Oz. You must have been a bit flustered and
>missed it.


>
>Just to refresh your memory, I said that I found it more than a little odd
>that you can find something as obscure as a manifold part number you claimed
>to have used 30 years ago but can't find the name of the class you raced in.

Yeah..but ignored the fact that the 8port head had inlet manifolds.

Just another piece of your avoidance.


You did after all state that the carbs bolted direct to the head and
required no manifold!





OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.