Which pomme car did you own *and* like?
in [Aussie Drivers]
|
Prev: I love you Kanga
Next: EL Falcon gas backfire problem.
From: OzOne on 29 Sep 2009 00:25 On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:30:50 +1000, D Walford <dwalford(a)internode.on.net> wrote: >hippo wrote: > >> There is no way a Minor or 1800 exhaust manifold could be considered a >> performance product, much as I like both vehicles. (It gets worse. I've >> owned four Saabs and a Herald as well.) "MoWoG" per se indicates *nothing* >> specifically about special tuning product, which was just as likely either >> to be uncoded or given an Abingdon specific branding. Cheers >> > >That's the way I remember it, if MoWog means special tuning parts then >every BMC car I've owned or worked on was full of special tuning parts. > > >Daryl Actually Daryl, You need to try a little harder. MoWoG does not mean special tuning parts...and I never said anything like that. MoWoG made some performance parts for BMC. OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: Atheist Chaplain on 29 Sep 2009 02:27 <OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message news:bo23c5l4v4aaou5303m1hq7qkob00oupcm(a)4ax.com... > On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 23:33:22 +1000, "Atheist Chaplain" > <abused(a)cia.gov> wrote: > >><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message >>news:fm79b59hnt7o6mt2v8mr34t4qg7lecnpiv(a)4ax.com... >>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:26:38 +1000, "Atheist Chaplain" >>> <abused(a)cia.gov> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I'm obviously not at thick as you then, because his point was patently >>>>obvious, he was saying that ANYONE can get a CAMS license, hell I even >>>>had >>>>one and it never made me any more special than anyone else, a point your >>>>obviously in denial about. >>> >>> No, what he wassaying is that he HAS a CAMS licence...He has no such >>> thing. >>> He has a piece of history..and worthless history at that. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> OzOne of the three twins >>> >>> I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. >> >>I don't remember him saying anything about driving with it, that was your >>assumption Ozone. >>I keep forgetting that comprehension is not one of your strong suits, but >>twisting others words and telling bald faced lies is your bread and >>butter. > > No he actually said he never used the licence that he once had. > > Seem your comprehension is at fault here...He HAD a CAMS licence..He > NO LONGER has one! > > He HAS a little folder that shows that he ONCE HAD a CAMS licence. > > Get it yet! > > > > > OzOne of the three twins > > I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. we GOT IT ages ago Ozone, your nit picking and deliberate pedantry is proof of yet another of your attempts at avoidance, just because YOU don't get it does not make it difficult to understand. But please continue, at least your existence is serving as an example of what not to do. Maybe that is your lot, you should just accept it and get on with your life. -- [This comment is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Church of Scientology International] "I like your Christ. I do not like your Christians. They are so unlike your Christ." Gandhi
From: John McKenzie on 29 Sep 2009 04:11 Noddy wrote: > > > ROTFL :) > > Here's a tip for you Oz: That "homologation list" you're referring to is > *not* a BMC Special Tuning catalog :) a whole week plus of googling, and still an epic fail. must suck to be him. I'll bet he started cutting himself by day 3. -- John McKenzie tosspam(a)aol.com abuse(a)yahoo.com abuse(a)hotmail.com abuse(a)earthlink.com abuse(a)aol.com vice.president(a)whitehouse.gov president(a)whitehouse.gov sweep.day(a)accc.gov.au uce(a)ftc.gov admin(a)loopback abuse(a)iprimus.com.au $LOGIN(a)localhost I knew Sanchez before they were dirty root(a)mailloop.com $USER@$HOST $LOGNAME(a)localhost -h1024(a)localhost abuse(a)msn.com abuse(a)federalpolice.gov.au fraudinfo(a)psinet.com abuse(a)asio.gov.au $USER(a)localhost abuse(a)sprint.com abuse(a)fbi.gov abuse(a)cia.gov
From: hippo on 29 Sep 2009 05:26 OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:30:50 +1000, D Walford > <dwalford(a)internode.on.net> wrote: > > >hippo wrote: > > > >> There is no way a Minor or 1800 exhaust manifold could be considered a > >> performance product, much as I like both vehicles. (It gets worse. I've > >> owned four Saabs and a Herald as well.) "MoWoG" per se indicates *nothing* > >> specifically about special tuning product, which was just as likely either > >> to be uncoded or given an Abingdon specific branding. Cheers > >> > > > >That's the way I remember it, if MoWog means special tuning parts then > >every BMC car I've owned or worked on was full of special tuning parts. > > > > > >Daryl > > Actually Daryl, You need to try a little harder. > MoWoG does not mean special tuning parts...and I never said anything > like that. > > MoWoG made some performance parts for BMC. > > > > > OzOne of the three twins > > I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. > > If Daryl needs to try a little harder, then I suppose that I do too! FWIW, your earlier post didn't say 'MoWoG made some performance parts for BMC'. It said: 'OK..Do some research on MoWoG. No Nod..Not the car club. Think BMC performance parts... I read that as an English language text, not as a cryptologist would. But, let's see if I've got it right now? You weren't saying that MoWoG made performance parts for BMC, you were actually saying that BMC made parts for itself? BTW, there *was* an early works cast iron crossflow head, which AFAIK was a development of the Westlake design (either or both of which came in 7 & 8 port versions). It was suspended for the alloy Arden design, which was very different with regard to timing, valve sequence and many other things. It definitely wasn't an alloy version of an earler BMC works project but it did *become* the official works head. I can't claim any racing experience with Minis or indeed anything else, but I've travelled in Minis since 1960, driven them since about 1969 and worked on them on and off since 1972. After the '64 850, most of my own road cars were 1100 based and the others I had much to do with were Coopers, all still 5 port but hardly ever running the orignal internals, carbs, or exhausts. -- Posted at www.usenet.com.au
From: Noddy on 29 Sep 2009 05:35
"John McKenzie" <jmac_melbourne(a)bigpond.com> wrote in message news:4AC1C1B9.4C61(a)bigpond.com... > a whole week plus of googling, and still an epic fail. must suck to be > him. I'll bet he started cutting himself by day 3. Lol :) Didn't you know? He's been off "flying his plane". Probably practicing his short strip approaches :) -- Regards, Noddy. |