Why are there so many haters here?
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: Coalition government: Transport Secretary Philip Hammond endsLabour's 'war on motorists'
Next: The fragility of car computers revealed.
From: ChelseaTractorMan on 21 May 2010 04:42 On Thu, 20 May 2010 20:13:58 +0100, "GT" <a(a)b.c> wrote: >Why are there so many car haters in this uk.rec.driving group or are they x posted from fanatical cycle groups? -- Mike. .. . Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine.
From: GT on 21 May 2010 05:02 "Adrian" <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:85mpc3Ff1qU8(a)mid.individual.net... > "GT" <a(a)b.c> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: > >> Why are there so many car haters in this uk.rec.driving group. > > NAHAY? I had to look that one up!
From: ChelseaTractorMan on 21 May 2010 05:29 On Thu, 20 May 2010 20:13:58 +0100, "GT" <a(a)b.c> wrote: >Why are there so many car haters In my experience so far car haters are exclusively inner city dwellers, often metrosexuals who wouldn't know one end of a power tool from the other (for instance). Is this impression correct? -- Mike. .. . Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine.
From: Ian Dalziel on 21 May 2010 06:22 On Fri, 21 May 2010 10:02:01 +0100, "GT" <a(a)b.c> wrote: >"Adrian" <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >news:85mpc3Ff1qU8(a)mid.individual.net... >> "GT" <a(a)b.c> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >> >>> Why are there so many car haters in this uk.rec.driving group. >> >> NAHAY? > >I had to look that one up! > Must be, then. -- Ian D
From: GT on 21 May 2010 06:29
"Ian Dalziel" <iandalziel(a)lineone.net> wrote in message news:7nncv5h9gqtr6qko53nojt0rajkt6hhs27(a)4ax.com... > On Fri, 21 May 2010 10:02:01 +0100, "GT" <a(a)b.c> wrote: > >>"Adrian" <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>news:85mpc3Ff1qU8(a)mid.individual.net... >>> "GT" <a(a)b.c> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>> >>>> Why are there so many car haters in this uk.rec.driving group. >>> >>> NAHAY? >> >>I had to look that one up! > > Must be, then. Yup |