Why still miles?
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: Nick Finnigan on 24 Jul 2010 12:54 Mortimer wrote: > "Nick Finnigan" <nix(a)genie.co.uk> wrote in message > news:i2euco$j8j$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> Mortimer wrote: >>> >>> Is there any reason why the month is divided into seven days rather >>> than any other? >> >> eh? > > I meant "divided into four weeks each of seven days". ... "rather than any other" like what?
From: The Peeler on 24 Jul 2010 13:06 On 24 Jul 2010 15:41:20 GMT, Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote: >"Mortimer" <me(a)privacy.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were >saying: > >>>> Is there any reason why the month is divided into seven days rather >>>> than any other? > >>> eh? > >> I meant "divided into four weeks each of seven days". > >Furry muff. > >Except, of course, a month isn't divided into four weeks each of seven >days. Some are.
From: Brimstone on 24 Jul 2010 13:08 "The Peeler" <peelingthe(a)invalid.admin> wrote in message news:gc7m46dvc24use0jl4mhga39tq54ondv8q(a)4ax.com... > On 24 Jul 2010 15:41:20 GMT, Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>"Mortimer" <me(a)privacy.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were >>saying: >> >>>>> Is there any reason why the month is divided into seven days rather >>>>> than any other? >> >>>> eh? >> >>> I meant "divided into four weeks each of seven days". >> >>Furry muff. >> >>Except, of course, a month isn't divided into four weeks each of seven >>days. > > Some are. Which ones?
From: Mortimer on 24 Jul 2010 13:42 "Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:9bSdnb7DHtmxg9bRnZ2dnUVZ7oGdnZ2d(a)bt.com... > >>>"Mortimer" <me(a)privacy.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were >>>saying: >>> >>>>>> Is there any reason why the month is divided into seven days rather >>>>>> than any other? >>> >>>>> eh? >>> >>>> I meant "divided into four weeks each of seven days". >>> >>>Furry muff. >>> >>>Except, of course, a month isn't divided into four weeks each of seven >>>days. >> >> Some are. > > Which ones? February, not in a leap year.
From: The Peeler on 24 Jul 2010 15:13
On Sat, 24 Jul 2010 18:42:37 +0100, "Mortimer" <me(a)privacy.net> wrote: > >"Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message >news:9bSdnb7DHtmxg9bRnZ2dnUVZ7oGdnZ2d(a)bt.com... >> >>>>"Mortimer" <me(a)privacy.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were >>>>saying: >>>> >>>>>>> Is there any reason why the month is divided into seven days rather >>>>>>> than any other? >>>> >>>>>> eh? >>>> >>>>> I meant "divided into four weeks each of seven days". >>>> >>>>Furry muff. >>>> >>>>Except, of course, a month isn't divided into four weeks each of seven >>>>days. >>> >>> Some are. >> >> Which ones? > >February, not in a leap year. In fact, ALL Februaries not in a leap year. |