From: D Walford on 13 Mar 2010 20:37 Clocky wrote: > Scotty wrote: >> " Scotty" <scoter1(a)warmmail.com> wrote in message >> news:4b9a180e$0$12922$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au... >>> " >>> >>> Ive tried (obviously not hard enough) to wear em out for ages. I >>> figured that the best was to get rid of them was to ruin them so I >>> flat spot the fronts at 120clicks, took it in to Toyota and told >>> them that I had to do an emergency stop and they are flat spotted. >>> they ripped em off and put the origional Dunlop LTs on. Boy, what a >>> difference they made! >>> >>> I can actualy stop in the wet now without having to slide to a halt! >>> >>> >> PS: If anyone thought that Im crazy to ruin tyres like that.... >> >> They had done 70,000kms and around 5-6mm left on tread (7mm on >> rears!). Felt like hard plastic rather than rubber. >> >> The lease company wouldnt replace them unless they where worn out or >> damaged. Toyota wont fit those tyres (Checked prior to 'emergency >> stop"). The flat spots where pretty much teh only way to stuff them >> to the point they needed replacing without running up a curb or >> similar. That I felt would endanger myself with vehicle damage now or >> later. >> >> >> >> >> >> I think had I driven like a nanna they wouldve last at least >> 100,000kms. > > My father got 140,000km out of the original set of Hankooks fitted to his > Daewoo Cielo. > The Bob Jane T-mart cheapies that were fitted to my old Colt when I got it > made the car undriveable in the wet and they had to go too. > > Dunlop Monzas as fitted as OE to some EF Falcons would last a very long time but were next to useless in the wet, replaced ours with Pirelli's and it transformed the car. Daryl
From: Noddy on 17 Mar 2010 01:44 "Milton" <millame23(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4ba02d1a$0$8832$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... > That's not very nice now, care to reconsider that last statement DeeGee? Pull your pants up and give your Mouth a go for a chance Roger. We've never met, we're unlikely to ever meet and I'm unlikely to ever *want* to meet you. Sending each other a couple of emails some time ago doesn't actually qualify as a real physical meeting, you fuckwit :) -- Regards, Noddy.
From: Milton on 17 Mar 2010 04:41 "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote in message news:4ba06d85$0$88966$c30e37c6(a)exi-reader.telstra.net... > > "Milton" <millame23(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message > news:4ba02d1a$0$8832$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... > >> That's not very nice now, care to reconsider that last statement DeeGee? > > Pull your pants up and give your Mouth a go for a chance Roger. We've > never met, we're unlikely to ever meet and I'm unlikely to ever *want* to > meet you. Sending each other a couple of emails some time ago doesn't > actually qualify as a real physical meeting, you fuckwit :) > > -- > Regards, > Noddy. I give up, what emails?? Your email address doesn't exist whereas mine does. Says more about you than me Noddy.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Prev: US headlight control Next: Laugh now Ford Territory owners.... |