From: Ret. on
Clive George wrote:
> On 24/06/2010 20:26, Chris Bartram wrote:
>
>> That's avoiding the point. They weren't being paid to ignore people.
> ...
>> Perhaps because the roads were quiet? I go shopping when the matches
>> are on, because driving there is less tedious. I don't see what's
>> cuntish about expecting someone to do their job, I'm afraid.
>
> Why is it that so many people have got this wrong? Their job at that
> point isn't necessarily to sell cars to Kev. If management are happy
> with them watching telly, that's within the scope of their job at the
> time.

And I just wonder what the top bosses at the dealership's head offices would
think about the lowly manager at the local dealerships making these
decisions? Somehow I suspect that the decision to allow workers to neglect
their duties in this fashion is not a 'top-down' policy.

--
Kev

From: Ret. on
Clive George wrote:
> On 24/06/2010 18:26, Ret. wrote:
>> Clive George wrote:
>>> On 24/06/2010 17:25, Ret. wrote:
>>>
>>>> So I take it that you would also have been happy for ambulancemen,
>>>> policemen, firemen, and doctors etc to also just tune in and switch
>>>> off for a couple of hours. After all - it's only every four years
>>>> innit?
>>>
>>> Do you not realise quite how ridiculous that argument is?
>>
>> So it's ok for some workers to neglect their duties - but not for
>> others?
>
> What duties were the salesmen neglecting? Do you have an SLA with the
> dealership telling you what they are?
>
> Have you still not understood that if their management were ok with
> it, they weren't neglecting anything?

Complete tosh. - And which management are you talking about? Do you think
this action was sanctioned at the highest level within the national company?
I doubt it very much.

--
Kev

From: Ret. on
Clive George wrote:
> On 24/06/2010 19:09, Ret. wrote:
>> Clive George wrote:
>>> On 24/06/2010 17:36, Ret. wrote:
>>>
>>>> As someone else has already pointed out - it is this attitude that
>>>> is the main problem with the UK today.
>>>> No, car salesman are not doing a life or death job - but they are
>>>> (supposed) to be doing a job. That job is to do their best to sell
>>>> cars and to provide a good service to customers.
>>>
>>> No, their job isn't defined by you, it's defined by their
>>> management.
>>>
>>> Management decide it's ok to watch the footie, they're allowed to.
>>> Get over it.
>>
>> Certainly they are 'allowed to' - whether it is good business
>> practice is another matter entirely...
>
> Now you're getting closer.
>
> So, what proportion of their business comes from footie fans and what
> proportion from tight-arsed wheel kickers? How much effort are the
> various dealers going to have to put in to make a sale to you? We know
> you spend quite a lot of time going to dealers - that adds up.

You really do talk some nonsense don't you?

--
Kev
From: bod on
Ret. wrote:
> Clive George wrote:
>> On 24/06/2010 18:26, Ret. wrote:
>>> Clive George wrote:
>>>> On 24/06/2010 17:25, Ret. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So I take it that you would also have been happy for ambulancemen,
>>>>> policemen, firemen, and doctors etc to also just tune in and switch
>>>>> off for a couple of hours. After all - it's only every four years
>>>>> innit?
>>>>
>>>> Do you not realise quite how ridiculous that argument is?
>>>
>>> So it's ok for some workers to neglect their duties - but not for
>>> others?
>>
>> What duties were the salesmen neglecting? Do you have an SLA with the
>> dealership telling you what they are?
>>
>> Have you still not understood that if their management were ok with
>> it, they weren't neglecting anything?
>
> Complete tosh. - And which management are you talking about? Do you
> think this action was sanctioned at the highest level within the
> national company? I doubt it very much.
>
>

They quite possibly did, knowing that half the country will be watching
the England match.
I bet they assumed that there was little chance of making a sale during
the match time.

Bod
From: Ret. on
Clive George wrote:
> On 24/06/2010 18:33, Brimstone wrote:
>
>> Because that's their job, it's what they're being paid to do.
>
> Since when have you decided what their job is?
>
> Are you the management at a car dealership? No? Well, in that case,
> you have absolutely no control over defining what their job is and
> what they're being paid to do.

So how would *you* define the role of a car salesman working in a
dealership?

Is it:

a) To sit around all day reading porno magazines?
b) To sit behind their desks and play computer games?
c) To set up a TV and watch football games?
d) To make every effort to induce potential customers to buy a car?

Answers on a postcard to...

--
Kev