From: Adrian on 25 Mar 2010 14:03 Cynic <cynic_999(a)yahoo.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>> Yes. How does that counter anything I have stated? Movements are >>> closely associated with behaviour, motive and intent, or hadn't you >>> noticed? >>No I hadn't. They certainly *can* be - but they most certainly don't >>*have* to be. > They almost always are. Few people go on a random drive without having > any motive (reason) for doing so. Does "Because I fancy going for a bimble" count as a "motive"? If not, then - we regularly go on "random drives". Don't know where we're going, beyond a general direction. Just see where we end up.
From: Rob on 25 Mar 2010 14:36 Conor wrote: || On 25/03/2010 15:10, Ret. wrote: || ||| I can understand that there are other people who are not like this, ||| who, instead of being amiable and co-operative, are argumentative, ||| unco-operative, and will not do *anything* unless they absolutely ||| have to. ||| || || I am quite lucky in this respect. As someone who is an ex-member of || the security services (Police/Armed Forces etc) , I do not have to || answer a police officers questions thanks to an amendment to the || Terrorism Act. In fact, unless he has good reason, the officer is || actually committing an offence under the Terrorism Act by asking me. They're huge, they're hairy and they're steaming... -- Rob
From: Cynic on 25 Mar 2010 15:26 On 25 Mar 2010 18:03:46 GMT, Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Yes. How does that counter anything I have stated? Movements are >>>> closely associated with behaviour, motive and intent, or hadn't you >>>> noticed? > >>>No I hadn't. They certainly *can* be - but they most certainly don't >>>*have* to be. > >> They almost always are. Few people go on a random drive without having >> any motive (reason) for doing so. > >Does "Because I fancy going for a bimble" count as a "motive"? Yes. You have a reason for driving. Perhaps sightseeing. Perhaps to enjoy the feeling of movement. > If not, >then - we regularly go on "random drives". Don't know where we're going, >beyond a general direction. Just see where we end up. Such a thing is unusual these days (with the cost of fuel being what it is) except with youngsters who have recently got their licence and are enjoying the experience of driving for its own sake. -- Cynic
From: Adrian on 25 Mar 2010 15:34 Bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >> Which - surely - is just another reason why there's no harm in Kev >> telling all and sundry. > Ok, how much money do you have in the bank? A lot less than I'd like. > Does your wife/girlfriend give good bj's? The wife? I wouldn't know. The g/f, otoh... Oh, and don't forget that I'm not the one arguing that since I have "nothing to hide", there's no problem with widespread information gathering and retention...
From: Bod on 25 Mar 2010 15:38
On 25/03/2010 19:34, Adrian wrote: > Bod<bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were > saying: > >>> Which - surely - is just another reason why there's no harm in Kev >>> telling all and sundry. > >> Ok, how much money do you have in the bank? > > A lot less than I'd like. > >> Does your wife/girlfriend give good bj's? > > The wife? I wouldn't know. > The g/f, otoh... > > Oh, and don't forget that I'm not the one arguing that since I have > "nothing to hide", there's no problem with widespread information > gathering and retention... > > Nice wriggle. Bod |