From: Adrian on 25 Mar 2010 16:43 Bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >> Oh, and don't forget that I'm not the one arguing that since I have >> "nothing to hide", there's no problem with widespread information >> gathering and retention... > Nice wriggle. Perhaps you didn't bother reading the "Oh, and don't forget..."?
From: Bod on 25 Mar 2010 17:27 On 25/03/2010 20:43, Adrian wrote: > Bod<bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were > saying: > >>> Oh, and don't forget that I'm not the one arguing that since I have >>> "nothing to hide", there's no problem with widespread information >>> gathering and retention... > >> Nice wriggle. > > Perhaps you didn't bother reading the "Oh, and don't forget..."? > > I read it. Bod
From: Adrian on 25 Mar 2010 17:32 Bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>>> Oh, and don't forget that I'm not the one arguing that since I have >>>> "nothing to hide", there's no problem with widespread information >>>> gathering and retention... >>> Nice wriggle. >> Perhaps you didn't bother reading the "Oh, and don't forget..."? > I read it. So did you ignore it, or not understand it?
From: Bod on 25 Mar 2010 17:36 On 25/03/2010 21:32, Adrian wrote: > Bod<bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were > saying: > >>>>> Oh, and don't forget that I'm not the one arguing that since I have >>>>> "nothing to hide", there's no problem with widespread information >>>>> gathering and retention... > >>>> Nice wriggle. > >>> Perhaps you didn't bother reading the "Oh, and don't forget..."? > >> I read it. > > So did you ignore it, or not understand it? > > I understood it. Bod
From: Adrian on 25 Mar 2010 17:44
Bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >> So did you ignore it, or not understand it? > I understood it. Gotcha. |