From: Conor on
On 23/03/2010 06:55, Steve Firth wrote:
> Maria<fallingdown(a)holeinshoe.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Several years ago, I had a letter from one of these survey companies
>> acting for the government - the letter said that I had been spotted by
>> one of those tall blue things by the road,
>
> I doubt it.

I've been stopped at a checkpoint whilst going about my legal business,
asked who I worked for (plastered all over the side of the wagon) where
I was going, where I'd come from (on the side of the wagon) , what I was
carrying and what time I started work. This wasn't from a copper but
some gubbermint busybody with a clipboard - the Police were the ones
pulling random cars in.

Its happened several times in various places. Each time, the response
was the same - a polite sod off.

--
Conor
I'm not prejudiced. I hate everyone equally.
From: Maria on
Steve Firth wrote:
> Maria <fallingdown(a)holeinshoe.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Steve Firth wrote:
>>> Maria <fallingdown(a)holeinshoe.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Several years ago, I had a letter from one of these survey companies
>>>> acting for the government - the letter said that I had been spotted by
>>>> one of those tall blue things by the road,
>>> I doubt it.
>> What was it then?
>
> I don't know, but those "tall blue things by the side of the road" are
> nothing to do with surveys and the information they collect can't be
> easily traced back to the registered keeper.
>
>> The journey was late at night - I didn't see any surveys. I go out in the
>> seven-seater so rarely that I even remember the occasion!
>
> And did you notice any vans marked "Golden River" parked by the side of
> the road, for example?

I wouldn't have, no.
From: Conor on
On 23/03/2010 10:55, Ret. wrote:

> What has tracking and dealing with criminals got to do with a 'Police
> State'? Isn't that what the police are supposed to be doing?
>

Because it doesn't just track criminals and the authorities have been
shown that they cannot be trusted with information.

> I use the North West motorways regularly. Am I concerned about these
> advances? Not in the slightest, why should I be?
>

Because lots of little bits here and there are leading to a very large
problem for anyone who values privacy.



--
Conor
I'm not prejudiced. I hate everyone equally.
From: Conor on
On 23/03/2010 10:57, Ret. wrote:

> Do you think they have the slightest interest in where *you* are going?
> (Unless, that is, your vehicle is tagged as 'of police interest). Look
> at the number of 'reads' per day. Do you think it remotely possible that
> that number could be recorded in any way to check on everyone's movements?
>

Yes. There is more than enough computing and network capacity to do that.


--
Conor
I'm not prejudiced. I hate everyone equally.
From: Brimstone on


"Conor" <conor(a)gmx.co.uk> wrote in message
news:hob4d1$nem$3(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> On 23/03/2010 06:55, Steve Firth wrote:
>> Maria<fallingdown(a)holeinshoe.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Several years ago, I had a letter from one of these survey companies
>>> acting for the government - the letter said that I had been spotted by
>>> one of those tall blue things by the road,
>>
>> I doubt it.
>
> I've been stopped at a checkpoint whilst going about my legal business,
> asked who I worked for (plastered all over the side of the wagon) where I
> was going, where I'd come from (on the side of the wagon) , what I was
> carrying and what time I started work. This wasn't from a copper but some
> gubbermint busybody with a clipboard - the Police were the ones pulling
> random cars in.
>
> Its happened several times in various places. Each time, the response was
> the same - a polite sod off.
>
When I was plating, and driving a car still in wax from the docks to the
dealer, I got stopped and asked for the details of my journey. When I said I
wasn't making the journey the car was, the DoT bod had to think about it.