Your Right to Drive
in [Drive]
|
From: MLOM on 1 Mar 2007 23:18 On Mar 1, 9:31 pm, "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > Our States are lying to us. Driving is not a privilege. Driving is a > Right. <snip long monologue> Not exactly right: we all have to pass a test and meet certain requirements to operate 1.5T+ machines at speeds that make them potential WMDs. Driving is risky business, and we have to show that we can handle that risk. If it were not for the license process and certain reasonable laws, driving would be about like a game of Calvinball (making up the rules as you go). With an opinion like you posted, is it any wonder Lt. H is smoking you like a cheap joint?
From: k_flynn on 1 Mar 2007 23:18 On Mar 1, 8:33 pm, Larry <x...(a)y.com> wrote: > In article <1172806269.072397.151...(a)v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>, > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > Our States are lying to us. > > Not this again. The only liar around here is you, proffy. > > > Driving is not a privilege. > > Yes it is. > > > Driving is a > > Right. > > No it isn't. Larry, He's upset because I just pounded him into hard ground over another lie in another thread, where he was claiming the US was not set up as a democratic state. I exposed his lies and he was so stoned, he accused me of "changing" my "identity" so he didn't recognize me at first, when I've never used another usenet identity at all. Shows you the danger of drug use.
From: k_flynn on 1 Mar 2007 23:19 On Mar 1, 8:42 pm, "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > Our States are lying to us. Driving is not a privilege. Driving is a > > Right. Our public streets were built on our property with our money > > for the purpose of enhancing our Right of Liberty. But, the more our > > public highways are made unusable by anything but the automobile, the > > more this LIE that driving is a privilege makes us all prisoners of > > privilege behind bars of blacktop. > > Proffsl, this is the same screed that you posted here almost a year ago, > and it was thoroughly and soundly refuted by a number of different > posters; and when you started losing the debate badly, you began > unleashing massive amounts of personal abuse on the posters who were > refuting your arguments. > > You lost the argument, utterly and completely. Accept it and move on. Scott, He's upset because I just utterly defeated his stance in another thread. Don't pay him any mind, he'll be sucking on his bong again real soon and drift away.
From: k_flynn on 1 Mar 2007 23:20 On Mar 1, 9:01 pm, Larry <x...(a)y.com> wrote: > In article <45E79D28.F0E65...(a)comcast.net>, > "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > Our States are lying to us. Driving is not a privilege. Driving is a > > > Right. Our public streets were built on our property with our money > > > for the purpose of enhancing our Right of Liberty. But, the more our > > > public highways are made unusable by anything but the automobile, the > > > more this LIE that driving is a privilege makes us all prisoners of > > > privilege behind bars of blacktop. > > > Proffsl, this is the same screed that you posted here almost a year ago, > > and it was thoroughly and soundly refuted by a number of different > > posters; and when you started losing the debate badly, you began > > unleashing massive amounts of personal abuse on the posters who were > > refuting your arguments. > > > You lost the argument, utterly and completely. Accept it and move on. > > He also completely fabricated a court decision, Scott. Don't forget > that doozy! And yet he still tried to deny it in the other thread yesterday! I mean, we proved he had completely fabricated a false cite, and he has the nerve to start up again! What a doper!
From: k_flynn on 1 Mar 2007 23:23
On Mar 1, 9:18 pm, "MLOM" <g...(a)netzero.net> wrote: > On Mar 1, 9:31 pm, "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote:> Our States are lying to us. Driving is not a privilege. Driving is a > > Right. > > <snip long monologue> > > Not exactly right: we all have to pass a test and meet certain > requirements to operate 1.5T+ machines at speeds that make them > potential WMDs. Driving is risky business, and we have to show that > we can handle that risk. If it were not for the license process and > certain reasonable laws, driving would be about like a game of > Calvinball (making up the rules as you go). > > With an opinion like you posted, is it any wonder Lt. H is smoking you > like a cheap joint? |