Your Right to Drive
in [Drive]
|
From: proffsl on 17 Mar 2007 15:02 Larry <x...(a)y.com> wrote: > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > Larry <x...(a)y.com> wrote: > > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > k_fl...(a)lycos.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > [prolific use of personal attacks deleted] > > > > > > > > Your prolific use of personal attacks and accusations > > > > makes it unpleasant to seek sustentative discussion > > > > with you. You lose. > > > > > > He loses? In what world? He's wiped the floor with you! > > > > You and him are losers from the get go. You always have > > been, and always will be. LOSERS. Oh! You'll claim you > > won, but you lost. > > Actually, the LAW says we won. I doubt that, and Reason says you lost. > Only the court case you FABRICATED has ever said we lost! You are LYING, again. I didn't fabricate a damn thing. I quoted ONE and ONLY ONE incorrect cite, and when my error was pointed out, I immediately acknowledged the evidence that the cite was in error. That alone shows more honesty in myself than you or k_flynn will ever be capable of. I've cited a dozen other correct Supreme Court dicta recognizing our Right of conveyance as being necessary to our Right of Liberty, and recognizing our Right of the usual and ordinary conveyance of the time. I've offered hundreds of arguments based on reason showing that not only is driving a Right, but also that Driver Licensing is useless. But, of course, all that means nothing to you. That you must insist on making so much more of this than it was only shows that your position is too weak to stand up to evidence and Reason. I've caught and evidenced both you and k_flynn in NUMEROUS LIES, and neither of you have been able to evidence any of them away. But, that makes no difference to the two of you. It's quite pathetic. You actually believe your "say so" is better than evidence and reason. > > I've wiped the floor of every room in the house with > > you and k_flynn AKA k_fl. > > Really? In what way? Who here agrees with you? > Anyone? Anyone? Are you so mentally myopic that you can't even acknowledge the five or six other posters on this thread who agree that driving is a Right that should be secured? I could cite you the proof, but no use. Everybody already knows their there. Only you, and possibly k_flynn refuse to see them, and citing the proof to you two is already a proven waste of time. You Lose oh so badly.
From: Scott M. Kozel on 17 Mar 2007 16:19 "proffsl" <proffsl(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > Larry <x...(a)y.com> wrote: > > > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > k_fl...(a)lycos.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > [prolific use of personal attacks deleted] > > > > > > > > > > Your prolific use of personal attacks and accusations > > > > > makes it unpleasant to seek sustentative discussion > > > > > with you. You lose. > > > > > > > > He loses? In what world? He's wiped the floor with you! > > > > > > You and him are losers from the get go. You always have > > > been, and always will be. LOSERS. Oh! You'll claim you > > > won, but you lost.I've wiped the floor of every room in the > > > house with you and k_flynn AKA k_fl. The two of you have > > > lost at every turn. You never had a chance. You are the > > > biggest liars that ever where, lying everywhere you go, and > > > that is why you are LOSERS where ever you go. Stick a > > > fork in the two of you, you're done. I've proved it beyond a > > > doubt. It's a dead fly on your nose, and you refuse to > > > acknowledge it. But, it's there, all squished and icky, with > > > fly blood splattering all over your noses. LOSERS. > > > > Once again Proffsl engages in massive amounts of personal > > abuse toward the posters who have completely and utterly > > defeated Proffsl's specious and bogus arguments. > > The only thing specious and bogus are the claims of victory by Larry > and k_flynn. Their only responce has been: "You've been proven wrong > in the past, so you are wrong." In the past? That's the same thing > they said in the past. Proffsl was the one who claimed "victory", when in fact his arguments had been refuted at every turn.
From: k_flynn on 17 Mar 2007 17:11 On Mar 17, 11:10 am, "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > Larry <x...(a)y.com> wrote: > > > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > k_fl...(a)lycos.com wrote: > > > > > > > [prolific use of personal attacks deleted] > > > > > > Your prolific use of personal attacks and accusations > > > > > makes it unpleasant to seek sustentative discussion > > > > > with you. You lose. > > > > > He loses? In what world? He's wiped the floor with you! > > > > You and him are losers from the get go. You always have > > > been, and always will be. LOSERS. Oh! You'll claim you > > > won, but you lost.I've wiped the floor of every room in the > > > house with you and k_flynn AKA k_fl. The two of you have > > > lost at every turn. You never had a chance. You are the > > > biggest liars that ever where, lying everywhere you go, and > > > that is why you are LOSERS where ever you go. Stick a > > > fork in the two of you, you're done. I've proved it beyond a > > > doubt. It's a dead fly on your nose, and you refuse to > > > acknowledge it. But, it's there, all squished and icky, with > > > fly blood splattering all over your noses. LOSERS. > > > Once again Proffsl engages in massive amounts of personal > > abuse toward the posters who have completely and utterly > > defeated Proffsl's specious and bogus arguments. > > The only thing specious and bogus are the claims of victory by Larry > and k_flynn. Wow. You are wrong again! Our claims of victory were backed up by the proven and undeniable FACT that we completely and utterly rebutted every single one of your positions; we showed how it was impossible for you to be correct about anything you said; then when your back was up against he wall you went and FABRICATED an entire court case thinking we wouldn't notice. You not only were PROVEN to be WRONG about everything; you were also PROVEN to be the ONE and ONLY LIAR in this whole thread. Proven. Beyond any doubt. > Their only responce has been: "You've been proven wrong > in the past, so you are wrong." In the past? That's the same thing > they said in the past. What was true remains true, you birdbrain. If it was true last year - and it was - that we completely defeated all of your arguments through logic and fact, it stands to reason and is as true today that when you wait a few months and merely re-spout your incorrect premises, they are still wrong. And so it is... you were wrong then (and we were victorious) and you are wrong today (and we are victorious). I don't know why you'd think that just by waiting since August to restate your LIES that they would somehow magically become true. Sorry, doper, we're still right.
From: Larry on 17 Mar 2007 18:30 In article <1174145104.667599.277220(a)d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, "proffsl" <proffsl(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > Larry <x...(a)y.com> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > Larry <x...(a)y.com> wrote: > > > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > k_fl...(a)lycos.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > [prolific use of personal attacks deleted] > > > > > > > > > > Your prolific use of personal attacks and accusations > > > > > makes it unpleasant to seek sustentative discussion > > > > > with you. You lose. > > > > > > > > He loses? In what world? He's wiped the floor with you! > > > > > > You and him are losers from the get go. You always have > > > been, and always will be. LOSERS. Oh! You'll claim you > > > won, but you lost. > > > > Actually, the LAW says we won. > > I'm sure you know the Lies verbatum. Just because you disagree with a law does not make it a lie. A law or court decision that you fabricate out of thin air, however, is a lie.
From: Larry on 17 Mar 2007 18:33
In article <1174151457.619986.32990(a)b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, "proffsl" <proffsl(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > Larry <x...(a)y.com> wrote: > > > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > k_fl...(a)lycos.com wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > [prolific use of personal attacks deleted] > > > > > > > > > > Your prolific use of personal attacks and accusations > > > > > makes it unpleasant to seek sustentative discussion > > > > > with you. You lose. > > > > > > > > He loses? In what world? He's wiped the floor with you! > > > > > > You and him are losers from the get go. You always have > > > been, and always will be. LOSERS. Oh! You'll claim you > > > won, but you lost.I've wiped the floor of every room in the > > > house with you and k_flynn AKA k_fl. The two of you have > > > lost at every turn. You never had a chance. You are the > > > biggest liars that ever where, lying everywhere you go, and > > > that is why you are LOSERS where ever you go. Stick a > > > fork in the two of you, you're done. I've proved it beyond a > > > doubt. It's a dead fly on your nose, and you refuse to > > > acknowledge it. But, it's there, all squished and icky, with > > > fly blood splattering all over your noses. LOSERS. > > > > Once again Proffsl engages in massive amounts of personal > > abuse toward the posters who have completely and utterly > > defeated Proffsl's specious and bogus arguments. > > The only thing specious and bogus are the claims of victory by Larry > and k_flynn. We haven't claimed "victory." There is no "victory." We have, however, thoroughly explained the law to you and why your position is not an accurate statement of the law, and why the cases you believe support your position do not in fact do so. > Their only responce has been: "You've been proven wrong > in the past, so you are wrong." That's true, because the law hasn't changed. So as long as you make the same erroneous claims, you will continue to be wrong. And we will continue to prove it. > In the past? That's the same thing > they said in the past. We were right then, and we are right now. |