From: k_flynn on 1 Mar 2007 23:44 On Mar 1, 9:41 pm, "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > "MLOM" <g...(a)netzero.net> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote:> > > > > Our States are lying to us. Driving is not a privilege. > > > Driving is a Right. > > > <snip long monologue> > > You snipped all of my arguments. You have no arguments. You have delusions. > > With an opinion like you posted, is it any wonder > > Lt. H is smoking you like a cheap joint? > > This is a personal attack, and only serves to weaken your position. As opposed you yours, which is based on fabricating phony quotations and misusing court cites. > Please do not behave like k_flynn, Larry or Lt. H[woever]. Because we defeated you much too easily!
From: proffsl on 1 Mar 2007 23:45 On Mar 1, 9:31 pm, "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > It should be noted that certain posters are attempting to obfuscate this thread with numerous postings not addressing my arguments. Already, in only a half an hour, this thread has 20 some posts, and only ONE of those posts actually even pretends to debate the issue. Obviously, this issue must cause certain posters great discomfort. Possibly, they should just avoid the thread, unless their purpose is to obfuscate the issue.
From: Scott M. Kozel on 1 Mar 2007 23:48 "proffsl" <proffsl(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > It should be noted that certain posters are attempting to obfuscate > this thread with numerous postings not addressing my arguments. > Already, in only a half an hour, this thread has 20 some posts, and > only ONE of those posts actually even pretends to debate the issue. > > Obviously, this issue must cause certain posters great discomfort. > Possibly, they should just avoid the thread, unless their purpose is > to obfuscate the issue. Proffsl, last year your same arguments were beaten to pieces in hundreds of posts that showed the fallacy of your arguments. Your coming here after that, with the same arguments, is nothing but trolling on your part. Go away. -- Scott M. Kozel Highway and Transportation History Websites Virginia/Maryland/Washington, D.C. http://www.roadstothefuture.com Philadelphia and Delaware Valley http://www.pennways.com
From: k_flynn on 1 Mar 2007 23:48 On Mar 1, 9:45 pm, "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > On Mar 1, 9:31 pm, "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > It should be noted that certain posters are attempting to obfuscate > this thread with numerous postings not addressing my arguments. It should be noted that you have no arguments. You fabricate phony court cases and invent posting handles to create the illusion that anybody not stoned would agree with you. You lost this argument last year, no need to rehash it.
From: Larry on 1 Mar 2007 23:52
In article <1172810516.081084.271810(a)8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com>, "proffsl" <proffsl(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > "MLOM" <g...(a)netzero.net> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote:> > > > > > > Our States are lying to us. Driving is not a privilege. > > > Driving is a Right. > > > > <snip long monologue> > > You snipped all of my arguments. How could someone snip what wasn't there? > > > > Not exactly right: we all have to pass a test and meet > > certain requirements to operate 1.5T+ machines at > > speeds that make them potential WMDs. > > That's the lie. Now, address my arguments in support of my position. > Otherwise, repitition of the lies does not make them any less the lies > they are. Neither does repetition of fabricated court cases, but that doesn't stop you! |