Your Right to Drive
in [Drive]
|
From: proffsl on 18 Mar 2007 20:32 "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > "Proffsl is my name, personal abuse is my game!" > > > > > > > > You just proved yourself to be a Liar. > > > > > > Another unwarranted personal attack. > > > > Simple observation of fact. > > This was a simple observation of fact -- > > "Proffsl is my name, personal abuse is my game!" Cite?
From: Scott M. Kozel on 18 Mar 2007 20:53 "proffsl" <proffsl(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > "Proffsl is my name, personal abuse is my game!" > > > > > > > > > > You just proved yourself to be a Liar. > > > > > > > > Another unwarranted personal attack. > > > > > > Simple observation of fact. > > > > This was a simple observation of fact -- > > > > "Proffsl is my name, personal abuse is my game!" > > Cite? It is an observation of your revealed behavior.
From: proffsl on 18 Mar 2007 21:35 Larry <x...(a)y.com> wrote: > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > "Proffsl is my name, personal abuse is my game!" > > > > > > > > You just proved yourself to be a Liar. > > > > > > Another unwarranted personal attack. > > > > Simple observation of fact. > > Very interesting how when someone insults proffy, it's > a "personal attack," yet when he uses the same exact > language, its a "simple observation of fact." You know, I was thinking exactly the same thing, except in reverse. When you or k_flynn, or any other rat-pack member, personally insults me, well, it's not really a personal insult, but instead only an "observation". Larry wrote: "You think an observation that "You're unable to comprehend it" is a personal assult (assult?!?)? It's a statement of fact. A completely fair one, at that. It's not an insult, or an assault, or even an assult." - http://groups.google.com/group/misc.transport.road/msg/728dc11845696aea But, when I make an observation of fact, well, that's a personal insult. Fact is, when Scott wrote: "Proffsl is my name, personal abuse is my game!" he was FABRICATING a false quotation, and in doing that was LYING, thereby making himself a LIAR. Simple Fact. If you believe otherwise, provide a Cite to where I wrote any such sentence. I already know it doesn't exist, therefore I am making a very accurate observation. > Hey proffy, I'm sure you can't spell hypocrite, but do you > know what it means? Your behavior, along with that of k_flynn and Scott, would make a fine definition of the word.
From: proffsl on 18 Mar 2007 21:36 On Mar 18, 1:55 pm, k_fl...(a)lycos.com wrote: > On Mar 17, 8:01 pm, "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > k_fl...(a)lycos.com wrote: > > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > I quoted ONE and ONLY ONE incorrect cite, and > > > > when my error was pointed out, I immediately > > > > acknowledged the evidence that the cite was in error. > > > > You had no choice, jizz-lips. You were caught BALD FACED ' > > > I could have denied it, like you and Larry always do. > > Your admission when caught red-handed says little for your defense, > since there could be no other course than admission without looking > even stupider than your claims already made you look. Now, keep going > and admit ALL your other LIES and you'll be taking that first hard > step toward sobriety. > > As far as me and Larry, we've never lied, so of course the only > reasonable choice is to deny your PHONY charges, since you've STILL > yet to come up with a SINGLE instance in which you think we've lied -- > which of course would have to be a mistake on your part anyway.
From: proffsl on 18 Mar 2007 21:45
k_fl...(a)lycos.com wrote: > > As far as me and Larry, we've never lied Hahahahahahaha!!! I should need to pay for this level of comedy. |