From: Larry on
In article <1174264332.512664.22070(a)d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
"proffsl" <proffsl(a)my-deja.com> wrote:

> "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote:
> > > "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> > > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote:
> > > > > "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Proffsl is my name, personal abuse is my game!"
> > > > >
> > > > > You just proved yourself to be a Liar.
> > > >
> > > > Another unwarranted personal attack.
> > >
> > > Simple observation of fact.
> >
> > This was a simple observation of fact --
> >
> > "Proffsl is my name, personal abuse is my game!"
>
> Cite?

The cites to your posts of personal abuse would run for several
megabytes!
From: k_flynn on
On Mar 18, 7:45 pm, "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote:
> k_fl...(a)lycos.com wrote:
>
> > As far as me and Larry, we've never lied
>
> Hahahahahahaha!!! I should need to pay for this level of comedy.

You are paying, the price is the tiny shred of dcecency you might have
had remaining by virtue of your (supposed) humanity going down the
drain with this pitiful and pathetic LYING campaign of yours.

This, plus of course the fact that you merely keep saying this
allegation but naturally, have never responded to the challenge of
naming even one instance where we have lied. You cannot do this, we
and everyone else know, because of the simple fact that we have never
lied. So your continued failure in the face of the mere request for
just one tiny fib on our part is painfully obvious to all of LOSENET
which is your natural domain.

I predict your next response, of course, will be more fake bravado
followed by your simpleton act of laughing (because you're stoned).
But no cite to any lie on our part, because they don't exist.

You OTOH lie with every breath. When you're not purely FABRICATING and
MAKING UP citations to court cases that are PHONY and you KNOW IT but
still try to pass it off... that's just the tip of the iceberg with
you, pothead. You go on to LIE through mischaracterization, such as
when you cited dicta from a case that UPHELD the legality of licensing
as some sort of evidence that licensnf is illegal. That was EVERY BIT
a LIE as the most obvious one where you FABRICATED your own court
case.

You are the PROVEN LIAR multiple times over.

From: Scott M. Kozel on
"proffsl" <proffsl(a)my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> Larry <x...(a)y.com> wrote:
> > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote:
> > > "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> > > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote:
> > > > > "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > "Proffsl is my name, personal abuse is my game!"
> > > > >
> > > > > You just proved yourself to be a Liar.
> > > >
> > > > Another unwarranted personal attack.
> > >
> > > Simple observation of fact.
> >
> > Very interesting how when someone insults proffy, it's
> > a "personal attack," yet when he uses the same exact
> > language, its a "simple observation of fact."
>
> You know, I was thinking exactly the same thing, except in reverse.
> When you or k_flynn, or any other rat-pack member, personally insults
> me, well, it's not really a personal insult, but instead only an
> "observation".
>
> Larry wrote: "You think an observation that "You're unable to
> comprehend it" is a personal assult (assult?!?)? It's a statement of
> fact. A completely fair one, at that. It's not an insult, or an
> assault, or even an assult." - http://groups.google.com/group/misc.transport.road/msg/728dc11845696aea
>
> But, when I make an observation of fact, well, that's a personal
> insult.
>
> Fact is, when Scott wrote: "Proffsl is my name, personal abuse is my
> game!" he was FABRICATING a false quotation, and in doing that was
> LYING, thereby making himself a LIAR. Simple Fact. If you believe
> otherwise, provide a Cite to where I wrote any such sentence. I
> already know it doesn't exist, therefore I am making a very accurate
> observation.

No, Proffsl, it wasn't a false quotation, nor was it intended to be a
quotation, I put it in quotes because it sums up and describes your
posting behavior to a "T".

"Proffsl is my name, personal abuse is my game!"
From: k_flynn on
On Mar 18, 7:36 pm, "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote:
> On Mar 18, 1:55 pm, k_fl...(a)lycos.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mar 17, 8:01 pm, "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> > > k_fl...(a)lycos.com wrote:
> > > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > I quoted ONE and ONLY ONE incorrect cite, and
> > > > > when my error was pointed out, I immediately
> > > > > acknowledged the evidence that the cite was in error.
>
> > > > You had no choice, jizz-lips. You were caught BALD FACED '
>
> > > I could have denied it, like you and Larry always do.
>
> > Your admission when caught red-handed says little for your defense,
> > since there could be no other course than admission without looking
> > even stupider than your claims already made you look. Now, keep going
> > and admit ALL your other LIES and you'll be taking that first hard
> > step toward sobriety.
>
> > As far as me and Larry, we've never lied, so of course the only
> > reasonable choice is to deny your PHONY charges, since you've STILL
> > yet to come up with a SINGLE instance in which you think we've lied --
> > which of course would have to be a mistake on your part anyway.

Your failure to respond to the challenge of citing even one instance
in which you think -- mistakenly of course, that we have lied is duly
noted, you PROVEN LIAR. You merely wish to bring us down to your doped-
up level of discourse. Sorry, Proffy. We maintain a perfect record of
being correct.

From: Paul Hovnanian P.E. on
proffsl wrote:
>
> Our States are lying to us. Driving is not a privilege. Driving is a
> Right. Our public streets were built on our property with our money
> for the purpose of enhancing our Right of Liberty. But, the more our
> public highways are made unusable by anything but the automobile, the
> more this LIE that driving is a privilege makes us all prisoners of
> privilege behind bars of blacktop.
>
> A Rightful Republic may only derive it's Rightful Powers via the
> Rightful Consent of the Citizens.

And the citizens have agreed to elect officials whose duty it is to
regulate behaviors of all of those who use the citizens' common
property.

Driving isn't really a privilege, its a limited right, granted to those
who demonstrate some minimal level of capability.


--
Paul Hovnanian mailto:Paul(a)Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Life is like a buffet. Its not very good but there's plenty of it.