From: Brent P on 18 Mar 2007 23:33
In article <45FE028E.D22C7B1(a)hovnanian.com>, Paul Hovnanian P.E. wrote:
> And the citizens have agreed to elect officials whose duty it is to
> regulate behaviors of all of those who use the citizens' common
> Driving isn't really a privilege, its a limited right, granted to those
> who demonstrate some minimal level of capability.
However government teaches most people it's a priviledge and most people
believe that. Then government does things like attach other things to
driving. Deadbeat parent? Lose your DL. Want a DL? submit to federal
national ID standards. I am not aware of the full list of things various
states have attached to DL's, probably most of them are to teenagers, but
this can't be done with a right, which driving is (just one where the
government establishes rules and competency levels to attempt to make it so
one person doesn't trip over another).
From: k_flynn on 19 Mar 2007 10:10
On Mar 19, 1:46 am, "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote:
> Now, go give yourselves a 12-gauge enima.
Note: As I accurately predicted, Proffy issues his standard "12-gauge"
directive instead of responding to the challenge to cite any of our
posts in which we have lied about anything. His continued inability to
provide any corroboration for his baseless claim about us is DULY
From: proffsl on 19 Mar 2007 14:06
> proffsl wrote:
> > k_fl...(a)lycos.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Wow, a marijuana, induced laughing jag from Proffy
> > > Woffy.Wattasurprise!! Now, since it is irrefutable that
> > > you indeed started the insults, the proof being in this
> > > very thread, where you were warned before anything
> > > started and then you started it afterward, maybe we
> > > can all enjoy this laugh at your expense, you bird
> > > brain.
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/5288b9335dfa4acb
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/549ad4881d22f317
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/d4ff38485e8ee283
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/c56c542045605cef
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/b1f7b2f8c07c2eee
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/f0b9e87bbecb1555
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/fe7f73ed54930f5e
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/a1cc1999b7da2ff0
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/75761ee625a238a8
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/9cffd39f333e81da
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/11bd866a2f8dd4c2
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/6f2ba6039c3f9986
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/65f90fd323b21cc4
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/191f8b34dc646b4e
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/6959b976adc431a8
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/3386875efead2860
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/0ea75a53355a9010
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.law-enforcement/msg/80ec9197a7b874c6
> Uh, fuzznuts? I hate to break it to you, but none of those
> states lie. If you could be so kind as to point out what
> factual information in any of those cites you mistakenly
> believe is a lie, I would be happy to enlighten you to the truth.
"Wow, a marijuana, induced laughing jag from Proffy
Woffy.Wattasurprise!! Now, since it is irrefutable that you indeed
started the insults, the proof being in this very thread, where you
were warned before anything started and then you started it afterward,
maybe we can all enjoy this laugh at your expense, you bird brain."
From: k_flynn on 19 Mar 2007 14:24
> k_fl...(a)lycos.com wrote:
> > proffsl wrote:
> > > k_fl...(a)lycos.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Wow, a marijuana, induced laughing jag from Proffy
> > > > Woffy.Wattasurprise!! Now, since it is irrefutable that
> > > > you indeed started the insults, the proof being in this
> > > > very thread, where you were warned before anything
> > > > started and then you started it afterward, maybe we
> > > > can all enjoy this laugh at your expense, you bird
> > > > brain.
And where is the lie in that?
It's all the truth.
You need to find a lie. You know, like what YOU do all the time.
From: proffsl on 19 Mar 2007 14:43
> You need to find a lie.
K_flynn, I've been this route with you before. You deny you lied, and
ask for proof. I show you the proof, and you ignore it, then ask for
proof. It's really a quite pathetic and boring game you play. I see
no use in responding to you any more.