Your Right to Drive
in [Drive]
|
From: k_flynn on 19 Mar 2007 15:08 Proffy woffy wrote: > k_fl...(a)lycos.com wrote: > > > > You need to find a lie. > > K_flynn, I've been this route with you before. Yes, and I've proven wrong the entire path. > You deny you lied... Because I did not lie. > and ask for proof. Because I know you lie and make a false allegation; I know you cannot provide proof and so far, I have been 100% correct. > I show you the proof... No, you did not. You linked to posts but you made no claim of any lies. > ...and you ignore it.... No, not only is this another Proffy LIE since I did NOT ignore it (much to the chagrin of people probably wishing I would ignore it and let this useless thread of yours die!) I responded immediately by pointing out the immateriality of your post, in which you merely link to posts of mine but make no claim of anything I said that was a lie, not even what you think MIGHT be a lie (and this is from you, a PROVEN LIAR in the fist place!) > ... then ask for proof. Actually, I'd settle for mere evidence since you could never prove that I lied about anything because I haven't lied. > It's really a quite pathetic and boring game you play. YOURS is the game-playing, by FAILING utterly to respond to the challenge to name even ONE lie you claim I made - which I did not - you repeatedly chose NOT to post anything I said that you claim is a lie and instead merely link to prior posts of mine, then NEVER STATE what it was in them that you mistakenly believe is a lie. You see? You can't just re-post my words; you have to actually point to whatever it is in them that you think, falsely, is a lie. You NEVER did that and NOW you, the consummate LIAR and proven without-doubt FABRICATOR, are backing out when pushed up against the wall by my PROOF of your continued LYING. > I see no use in responding to you any more. Good. It is obvious you need to back away with egg on your face. Because I once again proved you to be utterly wrong and a SERIAL LIAR. Thanks for demonstrating your cowardly lying ways once more!
From: Larry on 19 Mar 2007 20:37 In article <1174290374.879849.99090(a)b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>, "proffsl" <proffsl(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > Every discussion I get into with you, k_flynn and Larry ends up in > this manner, with you, k_flynn and Larry bombarding me with constant > personal insults from your three angles, and with the discussion blown > to hell. And, if I dare to stand up to even one of your libelous > accusations and correctly identify you as the bald face liars you are, > then all of a sudden all of the personal insults you've lobbed never > existed, and I become the one who's initiating the insults. How could *we* be the ones who started the personal insults when YOU created the thread and named it with expletives directed at us?
From: Scott M. Kozel on 19 Mar 2007 22:00 Larry <x(a)y.com> wrote: > > "proffsl" <proffsl(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > Every discussion I get into with you, k_flynn and Larry ends up in > > this manner, with you, k_flynn and Larry bombarding me with constant > > personal insults from your three angles, and with the discussion blown > > to hell. And, if I dare to stand up to even one of your libelous > > accusations and correctly identify you as the bald face liars you are, > > then all of a sudden all of the personal insults you've lobbed never > > existed, and I become the one who's initiating the insults. > > How could *we* be the ones who started the personal insults when YOU > created the thread and named it with expletives directed at us? Just today Proffsl told us that we should each blow ourself up with a shotgun blast. It is hard to get more personally abusive that making a statement like that.
From: proffsl on 20 Mar 2007 14:00 "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > Larry <x...(a)y.com> wrote: > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > > Every discussion I get into with you, k_flynn and Larry > > > ends up in this manner, with you, k_flynn and Larry > > > bombarding me with constant personal insults from > > > your three angles, and with the discussion blown > > > to hell. And, if I dare to stand up to even one of your > > > libelous accusations and correctly identify you as the > > > bald face liars you are, then all of a sudden all of the > > > personal insults you've lobbed never existed, and I > > > become the one who's initiating the insults. > > > > How could *we* be the ones who started the personal > > insults when YOU created the thread and named it with > > expletives directed at us? > > Just today Proffsl told us that we should each blow ourself > up with a shotgun blast. It is hard to get more personally > abusive that making a statement like that. Well, Scott, if you are going to post here and pretend you don't see the massive amounts of personal abuse at the beginning of this thread slung my way without any provocation of any kind on my part, I'm going to once again suggest you give yourself a 12-gauge enima. Wait. make it a double barrel enima. I don't have to pretend anything.
From: k_flynn on 20 Mar 2007 14:47
proffsl wrote: > "Scott M. Kozel" <koze...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > Larry <x...(a)y.com> wrote: > > > "proffsl" <prof...(a)my-deja.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Every discussion I get into with you, k_flynn and Larry > > > > ends up in this manner, with you, k_flynn and Larry > > > > bombarding me with constant personal insults from > > > > your three angles, and with the discussion blown > > > > to hell. And, if I dare to stand up to even one of your > > > > libelous accusations and correctly identify you as the > > > > bald face liars you are, then all of a sudden all of the > > > > personal insults you've lobbed never existed, and I > > > > become the one who's initiating the insults. > > > > > > How could *we* be the ones who started the personal > > > insults when YOU created the thread and named it with > > > expletives directed at us? > > > > Just today Proffsl told us that we should each blow ourself > > up with a shotgun blast. It is hard to get more personally > > abusive that making a statement like that. > > Well, Scott, if you are going to post here and pretend you don't see > the massive amounts of personal abuse at the beginning of this thread > slung my way without any provocation of any kind on my part, I'm going > to once again suggest you give yourself a 12-gauge enima. Wait. make > it a double barrel enima. > > I don't have to pretend anything. You have to pretend you can spell, don't you? "Enima?" I thought you might mean "enigma" or "enema," but with your well-chronicled stupidity, it might be a third alternative! BWAHAHAAAAHAAAAA!! What a LIAR you are, Proffy-Woffy! Why, I seem to remember that you had to PRETEND that you had a couple of COURT CASES to back you up so you went ahead and FABRICATED a completely PHONY citation or two!! So much for you LATEST bit of LYING on LOSENET. Yes, you're the Great Pretender (woo-oo, woo-oo!) Proffy: "I don't have to pretend anything." Bwahahaaaaa!! You hare to pretend you have a few brain cells left after tokin' up all night, don't you? So you're LYING yet again, bird brain. |