From: hippo on 12 Mar 2010 19:29 Clocky wrote: > > Noddy wrote: > > "Clocky" <notgonn(a)happen.com> wrote in message > > news:4b9a1655$0$27797$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... > > > >> Traction control and ESP go hand in hand. Yes throttle control is > >> part of ESP because it may need to reduce engine power where > >> required to maintain traction. > >> > >> http://fat.ly/34q7p > > > > Thought that might be the case. > > > > Fitting it to a performance car is a complete waste of time then :) > > There is always the off button ;-) > > > > Twit! 'should' not 'whould' (must be softwhould) -- Posted at www.usenet.com.au
From: Jason James on 13 Mar 2010 00:41 "Albm&ctd" <alb_mandctdNOWMD(a)connexus.net.au> wrote in message news:MPG.2605ae7767195737989af1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > > A tech I knew used 240 mains into old speakers to blow them up for > amusement > value. We had an instructor who was THE idiosyncratic of the training school. He would cook a raw sausage by applying 240 with 2 nails as scewers each end,..I kid you not! He'd apply some pulse-width modulation by switching the ppoint on and off as things sizzled along... Jason
From: Albm&ctd on 13 Mar 2010 01:28 In article <4b99bdf4$0$27809$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com>, notgonn(a)happen.com says... > Noddy wrote: > > "Clocky" <notgonn(a)happen.com> wrote in message > > news:4b990da2$0$8758$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... > > > >> Well, that is until you have worked at a Holden or Ford dealership > >> where leaking pumps, racks and hoses are bread and butter jobs ;-) > > > > They're not without their faults, and I've repaired plenty of them > > myself. However in the main they're pretty good and don't cause any > > issues if and when they develop problems. > > > >> No system should be able to do that, and I already said that Toyota > >> fucked something up. > > > > They did indeed, and that's the point. > > > > The fact that they *didn't* get it right which has demonstrated how an > > electric power steering system *can* cause major problems highlights > > the brittleness of the idea. At least with a conventional hydraulic > > system even if the pump fell off it's bracket, got wedged in the > > engine belt and was then shot out through the top of the bonnet it's > > be highly unlikely that it would have any effect on the steering. > > > >> Easy to measure when the electric system only operates when turning > >> the wheel as opposed to the hydraulic pump turning all the time. > > > > The load required to spin a power steering pump is very small, and it > > varies according to what the wheels are doing. With the wheels in the > > straight ahead position the pump is under no load and just > > recirculating fluid. It's only when the wheels are turned does the > > load change, and it varies according to the amount of turn applied. > > Low speed full lock turns require a large load compared to high speed > > straight line "adjustments". > > There is still measurable drag on the engine at any given time, not so with > electic power steering. > It would be interesting to know how much drag. Even at a standstill idling the power steering belt v-belt in older cars has to be fairly tight to avoid slip, cold startup especially. I wouldn't be surprised if the drag was similar to an alternator under load. I guess someone somewhere has got figures. Al -- I don't take sides. It's more fun to insult everyone. http://kwakakid.cjb.net/insult.html
From: Noddy on 13 Mar 2010 05:48 "Noddy" <Mission.Control(a)NASA.com> wrote in message news:4b9b4179$0$66792$c30e37c6(a)exi-reader.telstra.net... >> How about you provide a link to the report in the paper you read and lets >> see what was actually written vs your interpretation of what was written. Just to follow up on this, I just checked my paper stack (we're saving them for wrapping at the moment as we're packing boxes for storage) and I've still got the paper. It's pretty much as I told you. Two paragraphs at the bottom of page 8 and the details are correct. The only detail I had wrong was when it appeared in the paper. I thought it was last week or so, but it was actually closer to a month ago (it's been a busy month :) The Herald-Sun's website doesn't list the story exactly as it appears as "fill" in the print edition, but they have a more elaborate version here: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/business/toyota-worries-extend-to-steering/story-e6frfh4f-1225831711268 And News.com.au features a similar story (obviously from the same source) here: http://www.news.com.au/business/toyota-could-face-corolla-probe/story-e6frfm1i-1225828548892 After reading through those more detailed reports, it would seem the problem is worse than the original print story made it out to be. -- Regards, Noddy.
From: Jason James on 13 Mar 2010 18:35
"Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote in message news:4b9b993a$0$66788$c30e37c6(a)exi-reader.telstra.net... > > "John Tserkezis" <jt(a)techniciansyndrome.org.invalid> wrote in message > news:4b9b85c8$0$5421$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au... > >> This steering issue had prompted me to do a little more homework. The >> only way I can see that a steering *software* fault is going to cause a >> crash, is if the steering is entirely steer-by-wire in the truest sense. >> That is, the steering wheel is entirely separated from the rest of the >> steering mechanism. > > I was thinking that very same thing myself, but as far as I'm aware the > electric assist motors just wrap around the steering shaft and apply force > to "assist". If that is the case, it is safer in an "assistance fail" situation. The motors simply stop applying torque and the steering reverts back to a std unassist steering. That's my theory. In a hydraulic situation, the pump stops turning and the Left-Right valves may just shut, meaning you'd have to overcome *that* resistance before your arms can effect steering? A lot of assumptions there, I know. Jason |