From: boltar2003 on
On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:28:33 +0100
Chelsea Tractor Man <mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 15:52:07 +0000 (UTC), boltar2003(a)boltar.world wrote:
>
>> If it happened at Dungeness would anyone notice? The place looks like the
>> moon anyway. It could only improve it.
>
>thats why artists have gone to live there in spite of the power station.

If you're into miles of dull gravel punctuated by run down houses and a nuclear
power station then Dungeoness would be heaven. I prefer something a bit more
pastoral personally.

B2003

From: bod on
boltar2003(a)boltar.world wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:28:33 +0100
> Chelsea Tractor Man <mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 15:52:07 +0000 (UTC), boltar2003(a)boltar.world wrote:
>>
>>> If it happened at Dungeness would anyone notice? The place looks like the
>>> moon anyway. It could only improve it.
>> thats why artists have gone to live there in spite of the power station.
>
> If you're into miles of dull gravel punctuated by run down houses and a nuclear
> power station then Dungeoness would be heaven. I prefer something a bit more
> pastoral personally.
>
> B2003
>
>

Catford? :)

Bod
From: boltar2003 on
On Fri, 09 Jul 2010 10:41:01 +0100
bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>boltar2003(a)boltar.world wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 17:28:33 +0100
>> Chelsea Tractor Man <mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 15:52:07 +0000 (UTC), boltar2003(a)boltar.world wrote:
>>>
>>>> If it happened at Dungeness would anyone notice? The place looks like the
>>>> moon anyway. It could only improve it.
>>> thats why artists have gone to live there in spite of the power station.
>>
>> If you're into miles of dull gravel punctuated by run down houses and a
>nuclear
>> power station then Dungeoness would be heaven. I prefer something a bit more
>> pastoral personally.
>>
>> B2003
>>
> >
>
>Catford? :)

There are certain places that make even dungeness seem idyllic :)

B2003

From: Albert T Cone on
boltar2003(a)boltar.world wrote:
> Chernobyl is the worst case. Its very hard to make something that'll go off
> in a thermonuclear explosion which is why north korea took so long to do it
> and Iran still hasn't managed. If all it took was sticking a load of refined
> uranium in a large lump then Luxembourg would probably have nukes by now,
> never mind all of the middle east.

That is all it takes, but refining the stuff isn't easy or cheap, so the
trick is to make it go pop with a sub-critical mass. *That* isn't easy.
From: The Peeler on
On 9 Jul 2010 09:15:37 GMT, Adrian <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>Chelsea Tractor Man <mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding
>much like they were saying:
>
>> and the outer suburb people are not living in the PT intense environment
>> that typifies inner city living anyway. I live in London but am 8 miles
>> from a tube station.
>
><shrug>
>Don't blame me. I live outside London, and am about 500m from a tube
>station...

Metropolitan Line. Gotta be.