From: Doug on
On 7 July, 18:11, JNugent <jennings...(a)fastmail.fm> wrote:
> Doug wrote:
> > "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> [ ... ]
>
> >>> BTW, I understand you are also disabled but use a car. Why not an
> >>> electric bike which has much less adverse impact on the environment
> >>> and public health?
> >> No where to keep such a machine, as previously discussed.
> > You can store a bike almost anywhere, unlike a car.
>
> Yes, but you can go almost anywhere in a car, and you can't on a bike (not in
> a reasonable time, anyway).
>
You should see me zooming past traffic jams. For longer distances I
put my bike on an electric train. So all of my transportation is
electric now. No nasty, smelly, polluting, energy wasting ICEs.

Doug.
From: Adrian on
Doug <smithx(a)btinternet.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying:

> You should see me zooming past traffic jams.

Really? And should a pedestrian step out from between two stationary
vehicles...?

> For longer distances I put my bike on an electric train. So all of my
> transportation is electric now. No nasty, smelly, polluting, energy
> wasting ICEs.

Where's your electricity come from, Duhg?

Are you on a "green" tariff yet?
From: Adrian on
Chelsea Tractor Man <mr.c.tractor(a)hotmail.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding
much like they were saying:

> I find the places I like to go are not served well by trains.

You're clearly going to the wrong places, then...
From: Brimstone on

"Doug" <smithx(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:e8634e1b-6ddf-4d51-93fe-8374d7fbe023(a)g19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> On 7 July, 17:50, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> "Doug" <smi...(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:3ce01a3d-4e76-422a-a638-a8b391b0a62b(a)i28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > On 7 July, 10:46, "Man at B&Q" <manatba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Jul 7, 8:27 am, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > "Doug" <smi...(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >> >news:84108acc-0d80-4f10-bdcf-292273832372(a)u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> > > On 6 July, 19:08, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > >> "Doug" <smi...(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message
>>
>> >> > >>news:65c6aa89-896d-44f6-93b7-054f923b0f5b(a)k39g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >> > >> > On 6 July, 08:56, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > >> >> Environmentalists want people to use electric vehicles and yet
>> >> > >> >> they
>> >> > >> >> also
>> >> > >> >> complain when new power stations are being proposed. Going by
>> >> > >> >> this
>> >> > >> >> report,
>> >> > >> >> there isn't enough generating capacity to support a massive
>> >> > >> >> increase
>> >> > >> >> in
>> >> > >> >> the
>> >> > >> >> use of electric vehicles and so new power stations will be
>> >> > >> >> needed
>> >> > >> >> in
>> >> > >> >> addition to replacing those which are worn out and in need of
>> >> > >> >> replacement.
>>
>> >> > >> >>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/news/7874065/Electric-cars-must-b...
>>
>> >> > >> >> Quote: "Analysts for Saturn Energy calculated that a fuel duty
>> >> > >> >> of
>> >> > >> >> up
>> >> > >> >> to
>> >> > >> >> 10p
>> >> > >> >> a mile would be required to pay for the extra demand which
>> >> > >> >> will
>> >> > >> >> be
>> >> > >> >> created
>> >> > >> >> if the Government's targets on renewable energy are hit.
>>
>> >> > >> >> The Climate Change Committee has said that 1.7 million
>> >> > >> >> electric
>> >> > >> >> cars
>> >> > >> >> should
>> >> > >> >> be on Britain's roads by 2020. " End quote.
>>
>> >> > >> >> So which is it to be, more electric vehicles and more power
>> >> > >> >> stations;
>> >> > >> >> or,
>> >> > >> >> carry on as we are?
>>
>> >> > >> > No, just stop travelling and consuming so much per capita. Too
>> >> > >> > many
>> >> > >> > people are having it too easy and its bad for the planet and
>> >> > >> > bad
>> >> > >> > for
>> >> > >> > less fortunate people.
>>
>> >> > >> I agree Doug. But, there's just one thing I find puzzling.
>>
>> >> > >> Why did you buy an electric bicycle?
>>
>> >> > > Because I have a very painful walking disability. Even so I am
>> >> > > still
>> >> > > banned from pavements and railway platforms. Of course, I bought
>> >> > > an
>> >> > > electric bike, instead of the more usual car for the disabled, for
>> >> > > obvious reasons.
>>
>> >> > You already had at least one pedal cycle. Why did you think you
>> >> > needed
>> >> > an
>> >> > electric bike given that it increases the demand for electricity and
>> >> > thus
>> >> > contributes to the need for more power stations?
>>
>> >> And what aboput the environmental impact of producing and disposing of
>> >> the batteries?
>>
>> > Probably no worse than a car battery or even better due to difference
>> > in size and weight. BTW, Lithium from the batteries can be reclaimed.
>>
>> But if people didn't insist on buying such frivolous items such as
>> battery
>> powered bicycles then the question of disposal doesn't arise does it
>> Doug?
>>
>> There is also the question of the effect on the people and localities
>> from
>> where the ore is mined. Do you have any idea of the devastation being
>> caused
>> in those places Doug and that they are already running out and
>> alternative
>> sites will have to be found?
>>
> You are obviously ill informed, as usual.
>
> "...The largest reserve base of lithium is in the Salar de Uyuni area
> of Bolivia, which has 5.4 million tons. US Geological Survey,
> estimates of the production and reserves of lithium in metric tons by
> country are in the table. [29][39]
>
> Contrary to the USGS data in the table, other estimates put Chile's
> reserve base at 7,520,000 metric tons of lithium, and Argentina's at
> 6,000,000 metric tons.[40].
>
> On June 13, 2010, the New York Times reported that "Just this month,
> American geologists working with the Pentagon team have been
> conducting ground surveys on dry salt lakes in western Afghanistan
> where they believe there are large deposits of lithium..."
>
> That could explain a lot!

As I said, it's running out and new deposits are being found, just as with
petroleum.

>> How can you claim to be eco friendly when you buy such an unnecessary
>> item?
>>
> Because I am using an electric bike instead of a car. You of course,
> as a car user by choice, are definitely eco unfriendly.
>
Both the manufacture of and use of electric bikes causes pollution, just as
cars do. As pointed out previously, you are no more eco-friendly than anyone
else Doug.


From: Brimstone on

"Doug" <smithx(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:ac2003cd-b160-4c40-aed5-6c8f023c3243(a)c33g2000yqm.googlegroups.com...
> On 7 July, 17:52, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> "Doug" <smi...(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message
>> news:9f4f2eb5-3d06-4178-b833-2a2fa449f6e5(a)a30g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>> > On 7 July, 08:27, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> "Doug" <smi...(a)btinternet.com> wrote in message

>> >> > BTW, I understand you are also disabled but use a car. Why not an
>> >> > electric bike which has much less adverse impact on the environment
>> >> > and public health?
>>
>> >> No where to keep such a machine, as previously discussed.
>>
>> > You can store a bike almost anywhere, unlike a car.
>>
>> Only if you have somewhere to store it.
>>
> They can be stored on walls. I take it you don't live in a tent?
>
I don't have any available wall space and a bicycle isn't my idea of
decoration.



First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Prev: Italian Tuneups
Next: 20mph when lights are flashing