first they wreck people's motor, and then....
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: friendsofderek on 5 Mar 2007 05:13 On Mar 5, 10:02 am, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > Doug wrote: > > On 4 Mar, 19:08, "Knight Of The Road" <russiatruck...(a)hotmail.com> > > wrote: > >> "Doug" <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote > > >> > I do of course exclude DIY motorists who are capable of their own > > >>> mantenance, like the suss ones who clean their own sensors, but it > >>> must be very difficult for them in this age of increasing car > >>> complexity and vulnerability. > > >> Not like your Land Rover eh, Doug? > > > Indeed. As I recall it was pretty basic with no electronics. At the > > time the damage that such vehicles caused was not generally realised, > > unlike now where it is known but drivers like you just carry on > > regardless of the damage they are causing on a daily basis. > > Whereas you merely encourage the increase in unnecessary international > movement of goods and produce, eh Doug. i'd say he helps fuel it rather than encourage; he's a vital part in the international shipping chain ( as he's one of the consumerists who fuels it) new phones, food shipped around the world, multiple computers and probably fancy bits for his bike ( given how snobbish he's been about that in the past i'd not be amazed if thats the case but its just a though with no factual basis as yet) Fod
From: Doug on 5 Mar 2007 05:20 On 5 Mar, 11:13, "friendsofde...(a)googlemail.com" <friendsofde...(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > On Mar 5, 10:02 am, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Doug wrote: > > > On 4 Mar, 19:08, "Knight Of The Road" <russiatruck...(a)hotmail.com> > > > wrote: > > >> "Doug" <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote > > > >> > I do of course exclude DIY motorists who are capable of their own > > > >>> mantenance, like the suss ones who clean their own sensors, but it > > >>> must be very difficult for them in this age of increasing car > > >>> complexity and vulnerability. > > > >> Not like your Land Rover eh, Doug? > > > > Indeed. As I recall it was pretty basic with no electronics. At the > > > time the damage that such vehicles caused was not generally realised, > > > unlike now where it is known but drivers like you just carry on > > > regardless of the damage they are causing on a daily basis. > > > Whereas you merely encourage the increase in unnecessary international > > movement of goods and produce, eh Doug. > > i'd say he helps fuel it rather than encourage; he's a vital part in > the international shipping chain ( as he's one of the consumerists who > fuels it) > > new phones, food shipped around the world, multiple computers and > probably fancy bits for his bike ( given how snobbish he's been about > that in the past i'd not be amazed if thats the case but its just a > though with no factual basis as yet) > Just like the rest of your posts in fact.
From: Clive Coleman. on 5 Mar 2007 05:26 In message <1173088212.590977.238410(a)c51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>, Doug <jagmad(a)riseup.net> writes >Indeed. As I recall it was pretty basic with no electronics. So it was a diesel with no lights starter etc. -- Clive.
From: Brimstone on 5 Mar 2007 05:38 Doug wrote: > On 5 Mar, 11:13, "friendsofde...(a)googlemail.com" > <friendsofde...(a)googlemail.com> wrote: >> On Mar 5, 10:02 am, "Brimstone" <brimst...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Doug wrote: >>>> On 4 Mar, 19:08, "Knight Of The Road" <russiatruck...(a)hotmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> "Doug" <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote >> >>>>> > I do of course exclude DIY motorists who are capable of their >>>>> own >> >>>>>> mantenance, like the suss ones who clean their own sensors, but >>>>>> it must be very difficult for them in this age of increasing car >>>>>> complexity and vulnerability. >> >>>>> Not like your Land Rover eh, Doug? >> >>>> Indeed. As I recall it was pretty basic with no electronics. At the >>>> time the damage that such vehicles caused was not generally >>>> realised, unlike now where it is known but drivers like you just >>>> carry on regardless of the damage they are causing on a daily >>>> basis. >> >>> Whereas you merely encourage the increase in unnecessary >>> international movement of goods and produce, eh Doug. >> >> i'd say he helps fuel it rather than encourage; he's a vital part in >> the international shipping chain ( as he's one of the consumerists >> who fuels it) >> >> new phones, food shipped around the world, multiple computers and >> probably fancy bits for his bike ( given how snobbish he's been about >> that in the past i'd not be amazed if thats the case but its just a >> though with no factual basis as yet) >> > Just like the rest of your posts in fact. Your lack of denial that you're causing the rise in unnecessary shipping has been noted.
From: Clive Coleman. on 5 Mar 2007 05:35
In message <1173090036.669696.240230(a)64g2000cwx.googlegroups.com>, Doug <jagmad(a)riseup.net> writes >Just like the rest of your posts in fact. Just where in the UK were your many computers made? Liar, Hypocrite. -- Clive. |