From: jim beam on 1 Apr 2010 09:37 On 04/01/2010 04:38 AM, Observer wrote: > On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:41:36 -0700, jim beam<me(a)privacy.net> wrote: > >> http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/TechnologyDevelopment/OPPTD_FLY_High-Efficiency-Oil-Filters.cfm >> >> shock, horror, they used oil analysis to arrive at these recommendations! > > > I'm one of those guys who believes in 3000 mile intervals because it > has always worked for me. i keep garlic in my refrigerator because it stops elephants from standing in the butter. because it has always worked for me. > Do I care if no one agrees with me, NO. Do > I care if I can extend it to 5000 or more miles, NO. Do I claim my > way is the only correct way, NO. In other words, you do what works > for you and I'll do the same. superstitious nonsense - you have absolutely zero basis in fact. -- nomina rutrum rutrum
From: Obveeus on 1 Apr 2010 09:51 "Tegger" <invalid(a)invalid.inv> wrote in message news:Xns9D4CCE8BC8E62tegger(a)208.90.168.18... > "Obveeus" <Obveeus(a)aol.com> wrote in > news:hovjra$9p0$1(a)news.eternal-september.org: > >> Exposure to all the chemicals also causes many health >> problems. > > Question for you: What's a "chemical"? Did that statement really need to read as: 'Exposure to all the *harmful* chemicals also causes many health problems.' for you to understand it?
From: Obveeus on 1 Apr 2010 09:56 "jim beam" <me(a)privacy.net> wrote in message news:XdqdnQ1TWIHHPCnWnZ2dnUVZ_j4AAAAA(a)speakeasy.net... > On 03/31/2010 12:40 PM, Obveeus wrote: >> "Elle"<honda.lioness(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> news:beb4763f-74c7-4bf7-801c-7c0f79b766bd(a)e6g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... >> On Mar 30, 5:55 pm, "Bob Jones"<em...(a)me.not> wrote: >>>> Most people drive in severe conditions. >>> >>> -- For my 2003 Civic in severe conditions, the interval then becomes >>> 5k miles or six months. >>> >>> -- I would have to see a citation to believe that most people drive in >>> severe conditions. I think Jim B is right that "normal" is a word that >>> Honda chose for its manuals with careful consideration. >> >> I have seen 'severe conditions' described as 'lots of stop and go >> traffic'. > > yeah, on iffy-lube websites trying to get you to go into their shop and > out of your wallet every 3000 miles. > > >> If that is the definition, then yes, most people drive under severe >> conditions. > > nonsense. It is an 'if, then' statement and as such, you must understand that it is not 'nonsense'. The 'if' part may be false, though, rendering the conclusion useless. I think we agree that, the claim that people need to change their oil every 3,000 miles or on some time interval is nonsense promoted by auto repair people.
From: Obveeus on 1 Apr 2010 09:58 "jim beam" <me(a)privacy.net> wrote in message news:XdqdnQxTWIE5PCnWnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d(a)speakeasy.net... > On 04/01/2010 04:38 AM, Observer wrote: >> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:41:36 -0700, jim beam<me(a)privacy.net> wrote: >> >>> http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/TechnologyDevelopment/OPPTD_FLY_High-Efficiency-Oil-Filters.cfm >>> >>> shock, horror, they used oil analysis to arrive at these >>> recommendations! >> >> >> I'm one of those guys who believes in 3000 mile intervals because it >> has always worked for me. > > i keep garlic in my refrigerator because it stops elephants from standing > in the butter. because it has always worked for me. FACT: De-ionized salt works just as well. >> Do I care if no one agrees with me, NO. Do >> I care if I can extend it to 5000 or more miles, NO. Do I claim my >> way is the only correct way, NO. In other words, you do what works >> for you and I'll do the same. > > superstitious nonsense - you have absolutely zero basis in fact. He didn't claim any basis in fact.
From: jim on 1 Apr 2010 10:00
Dave Kelsen wrote: > never been one of the most helpful people here. Nor did I claim to be > one of those folks. But I have been here for years. Your reading > comprehension seems to be on a level with your reasoning abilities. Shame. He made several casual observations. I wonder which one of those statements rang true and got you so bent out of shape. I'm guessing this one: "Some people want to feel superior, or it could be they want reinforcement of their own beliefs, because they are not sure of those beliefs." |