From: jim beam on
On 04/01/2010 04:38 AM, Observer wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:41:36 -0700, jim beam<me(a)privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/TechnologyDevelopment/OPPTD_FLY_High-Efficiency-Oil-Filters.cfm
>>
>> shock, horror, they used oil analysis to arrive at these recommendations!
>
>
> I'm one of those guys who believes in 3000 mile intervals because it
> has always worked for me.

i keep garlic in my refrigerator because it stops elephants from
standing in the butter. because it has always worked for me.


> Do I care if no one agrees with me, NO. Do
> I care if I can extend it to 5000 or more miles, NO. Do I claim my
> way is the only correct way, NO. In other words, you do what works
> for you and I'll do the same.

superstitious nonsense - you have absolutely zero basis in fact.


--
nomina rutrum rutrum
From: Obveeus on

"Tegger" <invalid(a)invalid.inv> wrote in message
news:Xns9D4CCE8BC8E62tegger(a)208.90.168.18...
> "Obveeus" <Obveeus(a)aol.com> wrote in
> news:hovjra$9p0$1(a)news.eternal-september.org:
>
>> Exposure to all the chemicals also causes many health
>> problems.
>
> Question for you: What's a "chemical"?

Did that statement really need to read as: 'Exposure to all the *harmful*
chemicals also causes many health problems.' for you to understand it?


From: Obveeus on

"jim beam" <me(a)privacy.net> wrote in message
news:XdqdnQ1TWIHHPCnWnZ2dnUVZ_j4AAAAA(a)speakeasy.net...
> On 03/31/2010 12:40 PM, Obveeus wrote:
>> "Elle"<honda.lioness(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:beb4763f-74c7-4bf7-801c-7c0f79b766bd(a)e6g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>> On Mar 30, 5:55 pm, "Bob Jones"<em...(a)me.not> wrote:
>>>> Most people drive in severe conditions.
>>>
>>> -- For my 2003 Civic in severe conditions, the interval then becomes
>>> 5k miles or six months.
>>>
>>> -- I would have to see a citation to believe that most people drive in
>>> severe conditions. I think Jim B is right that "normal" is a word that
>>> Honda chose for its manuals with careful consideration.
>>
>> I have seen 'severe conditions' described as 'lots of stop and go
>> traffic'.
>
> yeah, on iffy-lube websites trying to get you to go into their shop and
> out of your wallet every 3000 miles.
>
>
>> If that is the definition, then yes, most people drive under severe
>> conditions.
>
> nonsense.

It is an 'if, then' statement and as such, you must understand that it is
not 'nonsense'. The 'if' part may be false, though, rendering the
conclusion useless. I think we agree that, the claim that people need to
change their oil every 3,000 miles or on some time interval is nonsense
promoted by auto repair people.


From: Obveeus on

"jim beam" <me(a)privacy.net> wrote in message
news:XdqdnQxTWIE5PCnWnZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d(a)speakeasy.net...
> On 04/01/2010 04:38 AM, Observer wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:41:36 -0700, jim beam<me(a)privacy.net> wrote:
>>
>>> http://www.dtsc.ca.gov/TechnologyDevelopment/OPPTD_FLY_High-Efficiency-Oil-Filters.cfm
>>>
>>> shock, horror, they used oil analysis to arrive at these
>>> recommendations!
>>
>>
>> I'm one of those guys who believes in 3000 mile intervals because it
>> has always worked for me.
>
> i keep garlic in my refrigerator because it stops elephants from standing
> in the butter. because it has always worked for me.

FACT: De-ionized salt works just as well.

>> Do I care if no one agrees with me, NO. Do
>> I care if I can extend it to 5000 or more miles, NO. Do I claim my
>> way is the only correct way, NO. In other words, you do what works
>> for you and I'll do the same.
>
> superstitious nonsense - you have absolutely zero basis in fact.

He didn't claim any basis in fact.


From: jim on


Dave Kelsen wrote:

> never been one of the most helpful people here. Nor did I claim to be
> one of those folks. But I have been here for years. Your reading
> comprehension seems to be on a level with your reasoning abilities. Shame.

He made several casual observations. I wonder which one of those statements
rang true and got you so bent out of shape. I'm guessing this one:

"Some people want to feel superior, or it could be they want
reinforcement of their own beliefs, because they are not sure
of those beliefs."