Prev: Falcon remote problem....
Next: 92 Starwagon
From: Noddy on 25 Apr 2010 05:41

"D Walford" <dwalford(a)internode.on.net> wrote in message
news:4bd40ade$0$27806$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com...

> Because it works, Holdens current V8 is an excellent engine that delivers
> lots of power and good economy, they would be nuts to change it.
> Technology for the sake of technology is a just a wank.

Absolutely.

--
Regards,
Noddy.


From: Neil Gerace on 25 Apr 2010 06:46
Clocky wrote:

> An extra 85KW plus an extra 174NM at a cost of a miserly 1.8L/100KM

Of course if you actually want to use all that extra mumbo, it'll cost you a lot more than an extra 1.8L/100km :)



From: Noddy on 25 Apr 2010 07:13

"Doug Jewell" <ask(a)and.maybe.ill.tell.you> wrote in message
news:3rOdnT1yt_Rbg0nWnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d(a)westnet.com.au...

> 11 on the highway? Bloody hell, do you have a set of spoilers off an
> aircraft fitted to it or something?

Be wary of Roger. He lays claim to many things and most of it is fantasy :)

--
Regards,
Noddy.


From: Clocky on 25 Apr 2010 07:43
Neil Gerace wrote:
> Clocky wrote:
>
>> An extra 85KW plus an extra 174NM at a cost of a miserly 1.8L/100KM
>
> Of course if you actually want to use all that extra mumbo, it'll
> cost you a lot more than an extra 1.8L/100km :)

Towing a decent size trailer, and all other things being equal, I wouldn't
be so confident of that.

That gutless front wheel driving V6 isn't going to like it.


From: OzOne on 25 Apr 2010 07:58
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 20:44:40 +1000, "Dan---"
<hsvtourer(a)hsv.co.uk.com.au> wrote:


>Strange but true it still spins the wheels when you trod on the go pedal.
>:-)

One day you'll learn throttle control....




OzOne of the three twins

I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Prev: Falcon remote problem....
Next: 92 Starwagon