From: Noddy on

"Kev" <kevcat(a)optunet.com.au> wrote in message
news:4bc991a8$0$19545$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au...

> @ 1:48, is that an FB/EK holden???

There was a few of those things, and while I don't know what they were they
weren't FB/EK Holdens. I thought they might have been FC's or FE's, but it's
hard to tell.

--
Regards,
Noddy.





From: FOG on
Hindustan Ambassador, or as you say, Morris Oxford, go
here.http://www.hmambassador.com/showroom.asp


"Blue Heeler" <osd351(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:xn0gt15sx11m2e000(a)news.individual.net...
> Noddy wrote:
>
>> There was a few of those things, and while I don't know what they
>> were they weren't FB/EK Holdens. I thought they might have been FC's
>> or FE's, but it's hard to tell.
>
> I reckon either Morris Oxfords or similar vintage Vauxhall.
>
>
> --
>


From: the fonz on
On Apr 17, 5:24 pm, F Murtz <hagg...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> Why do we need so many road laws? look no accidents.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjrEQaG5jPM

no accidents? that video went for 2 minutes. india's road toll is
disastrous.

they actually have decent laws - their society is based on english
principles of law but they are not enforced. anyone who's travelled on
India's roads would never advocate them as safe - they are very nerve
wracking.
From: George W Frost on

"John Tserkezis" <jt(a)techniciansyndrome.org.invalid> wrote in message
news:4bc99f75$0$5591$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au...
>F Murtz wrote:
>
>> Why do we need so many road laws? look no accidents.
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjrEQaG5jPM
>
> India actually has a high road toll. Reputed to be one of the highest
> in the world. (depending on how you count the stats)
>
> Media sites many reasons why: Growing traffic on roads unable to deal
> with it. Driver inability due to licencing corruption enabling
> untrained drivers to drive. Pedestrians, cyclists, motorcyclists are
> the worst off, mainly because they either don't wear helmets, or metal
> wins over flesh any day. Poorly maintained roads, along with roads
> never designed to deal with the current levels of traffic are also sited.
>
> See? Our politicians are right when they say speed cameras save lives.

Do you mean "sites" and "sited" as in placed there
or cites and cited as in quoted?


From: John Tserkezis on
George W Frost wrote:
> "John Tserkezis" <jt(a)techniciansyndrome.org.invalid> wrote in message
> news:4bc99f75$0$5591$afc38c87(a)news.optusnet.com.au...
>> F Murtz wrote:
>>
>>> Why do we need so many road laws? look no accidents.
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RjrEQaG5jPM
>>
>> India actually has a high road toll. Reputed to be one of the highest
>> in the world. (depending on how you count the stats)
>>
>> Media sites many reasons why: Growing traffic on roads unable to deal
>> with it. Driver inability due to licencing corruption enabling
>> untrained drivers to drive. Pedestrians, cyclists, motorcyclists are
>> the worst off, mainly because they either don't wear helmets, or metal
>> wins over flesh any day. Poorly maintained roads, along with roads
>> never designed to deal with the current levels of traffic are also sited.
>>
>> See? Our politicians are right when they say speed cameras save lives.

> Do you mean "sites" and "sited" as in placed there
> or cites and cited as in quoted?

Yeah sorry, I realised I wasn't clear on that just after sending.

In that context, my intention was: "Media states many reasons...".
Likewise, "...traffic are also stated.".