rudds gone
in [Aussie Drivers]
|
From: hippo on 20 Jun 2010 08:10 D Walford wrote: > > On 20/06/2010 7:33 PM, atec7 7 > wrote: > > Blue Heeler wrote: > >> D Walford wrote: > >> > >>> I suspect you are correct but IMO Labour's chances at the election > >>> would greatly increase if Gillard was the leader. > >>> > >> > >> > >> Whilst it must be admitted that Rudd is on the nose, the really, scary, > >> scary thing is that people are seriously contemplating electing the Mad > >> Monk. > >> > > Wake up to your self > > self admitted clueless megalomaniac or > > > > > > tony an unknown quantity who is learning very very fast > > > He'd need to increase his learning by 100 fold and denounce his religion > to get my vote. > He lost any of the small amount of cred he had with me when he started > making policy on the run without consulting with his colleagues, not > only does he worship an imaginary God he thinks of himself as one. > Like Labour the Libs would dramatically increase their chances by > getting a new leader, I disliked Abbott 10yrs before I had even heard of > Rudd. > > > Daryl > > You have a right to be an atheist or an agnostic. Abbott has a right to follow the God in which he believes. His right doesn't mean you're wrong, just as your right doesn't mean you're right. Cheers -- Posted at www.usenet.com.au
From: Toby on 20 Jun 2010 08:17 On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:10:42 +0000 (UTC), hippo wrote: > D Walford wrote: >> >> On 20/06/2010 7:33 PM, atec7 7 > wrote: >>> Blue Heeler wrote: >>>> D Walford wrote: >>>> >>>>> I suspect you are correct but IMO Labour's chances at the election >>>>> would greatly increase if Gillard was the leader. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Whilst it must be admitted that Rudd is on the nose, the really, scary, >>>> scary thing is that people are seriously contemplating electing the Mad >>>> Monk. >>>> >>> Wake up to your self >>> self admitted clueless megalomaniac or >>> >>> >>> tony an unknown quantity who is learning very very fast >> >> >> He'd need to increase his learning by 100 fold and denounce his religion >> to get my vote. >> He lost any of the small amount of cred he had with me when he started >> making policy on the run without consulting with his colleagues, not >> only does he worship an imaginary God he thinks of himself as one. >> Like Labour the Libs would dramatically increase their chances by >> getting a new leader, I disliked Abbott 10yrs before I had even heard of >> Rudd. >> >> >> Daryl >> >> > > You have a right to be an atheist or an agnostic. > Abbott has a right to follow the God in which he believes. > His right doesn't mean you're wrong, > just as your right doesn't mean you're right. > Cheers An interesting idea - that the God Botherers 'right doesn't mean you're wrong' Where did you find that bullshit? Or, did you just make it up? -- Toby. Caveat Lector
From: hippo on 20 Jun 2010 08:40 Toby wrote: > > On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:10:42 +0000 (UTC), hippo wrote: > > > D Walford wrote: > >> > >> On 20/06/2010 7:33 PM, atec7 7 > wrote: > >>> Blue Heeler wrote: > >>>> D Walford wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I suspect you are correct but IMO Labour's chances at the election > >>>>> would greatly increase if Gillard was the leader. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Whilst it must be admitted that Rudd is on the nose, the really, scary, > >>>> scary thing is that people are seriously contemplating electing the Mad > >>>> Monk. > >>>> > >>> Wake up to your self > >>> self admitted clueless megalomaniac or > >>> > >>> > >>> tony an unknown quantity who is learning very very fast > >> > >> > >> He'd need to increase his learning by 100 fold and denounce his religion > >> to get my vote. > >> He lost any of the small amount of cred he had with me when he started > >> making policy on the run without consulting with his colleagues, not > >> only does he worship an imaginary God he thinks of himself as one. > >> Like Labour the Libs would dramatically increase their chances by > >> getting a new leader, I disliked Abbott 10yrs before I had even heard of > >> Rudd. > >> > >> > >> Daryl > >> > >> > > > > You have a right to be an atheist or an agnostic. > > Abbott has a right to follow the God in which he believes. > > His right doesn't mean you're wrong, > > just as your right doesn't mean you're right. > > Cheers > > An interesting idea - that the God Botherers 'right doesn't mean you're > wrong' > Where did you find that bullshit? > Or, did you just make it up? > > > If it bothers you that much Toby, change it to: 'Your right doesn't mean you're wrong, just as his right doesn't mean you're right.' Happy now? :) BTW, Why is it bullshit? It's just philosophical poetic prose. Oh... and yes. -- Posted at www.usenet.com.au
From: PhilD on 20 Jun 2010 09:20 "hippo" <am9obmhAc2hvYWwubmV0LmF1(a)REGISTERED_USER_usenet.com.au> wrote in message news:hvl27j$3kt$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... > Toby wrote: >> >> On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 12:10:42 +0000 (UTC), hippo wrote: >> >> > D Walford wrote: >> >> >> >> On 20/06/2010 7:33 PM, atec7 7 > wrote: >> >>> Blue Heeler wrote: >> >>>> D Walford wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>> I suspect you are correct but IMO Labour's chances at the election >> >>>>> would greatly increase if Gillard was the leader. >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> Whilst it must be admitted that Rudd is on the nose, the really, >> >>>> scary, >> >>>> scary thing is that people are seriously contemplating electing the >> >>>> Mad >> >>>> Monk. >> >>>> >> >>> Wake up to your self >> >>> self admitted clueless megalomaniac or >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> tony an unknown quantity who is learning very very fast >> >> >> >> >> >> He'd need to increase his learning by 100 fold and denounce his >> >> religion >> >> to get my vote. >> >> He lost any of the small amount of cred he had with me when he started >> >> making policy on the run without consulting with his colleagues, not >> >> only does he worship an imaginary God he thinks of himself as one. >> >> Like Labour the Libs would dramatically increase their chances by >> >> getting a new leader, I disliked Abbott 10yrs before I had even heard >> >> of >> >> Rudd. >> >> >> >> >> >> Daryl >> >> >> >> >> > >> > You have a right to be an atheist or an agnostic. >> > Abbott has a right to follow the God in which he believes. >> > His right doesn't mean you're wrong, >> > just as your right doesn't mean you're right. >> > Cheers >> >> An interesting idea - that the God Botherers 'right doesn't mean you're >> wrong' >> Where did you find that bullshit? >> Or, did you just make it up? >> >> >> > > If it bothers you that much Toby, change it to: > > 'Your right doesn't mean you're wrong, > just as his right doesn't mean you're right.' > > Happy now? :) > > BTW, Why is it bullshit? It's just philosophical poetic prose. > > Oh... and yes. I understood it, or the intent of it. They have the right to believe whatever religion they like, but it offends me when they, or anyone else tries to impose that view on me. Too often politicians, on all sides, have done exactly that and 2 that come to immediate mind are Internet censorship and euthanasia. PhilD
From: atec7 7 ""atec77" on 20 Jun 2010 09:39
D Walford wrote: > On 20/06/2010 6:33 PM, Blue Heeler wrote: >> D Walford wrote: >> >>> >>> I suspect you are correct but IMO Labour's chances at the election >>> would greatly increase if Gillard was the leader. >>> >> >> >> Whilst it must be admitted that Rudd is on the nose, the really, scary, >> scary thing is that people are seriously contemplating electing the Mad >> Monk. >> > Not much of an alternative that's for sure. > It would be a very different contest if it was between Gillard and maybe > Hocking, Abbott stinks worse than Rudd. > > > Daryl Tony seems like a nice bloke ( I have my doubts) but in the past he had a reputation for being a stickler and very tough ( that's arsehole to you) and that's exactly what we need after that limp wristed turncoat laborite |