From: mysteryroach on
On Apr 15, 4:28 am, "Sharx35" <shar...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Clive" <cl...(a)yewbank.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> news:eOCtT0KbJlxLFwtc(a)yewbank.demon.co.uk...
>
> > In message <u6Rwn.76099$NH1.71...(a)newsfe14.iad>, lil abner <?@?.?.invalid>
> > writes
> >>There are as many killed by the belts as "saved?"
> > Bullshit, the success rates for belts is 85%
> > --
> > Clive
>
> Probably, even higher.  I started buckling up BEFORE it was mandatory, even
> though I normally rail against any nanny rules.
>
>
>
> - Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted tex


break a windshield with your head, as i did, and you'll gladly suffer
a little inconvenience, and maybe learn to appreciate it too.
From: Ed Pawlowski on

"Sharx35" <sharx35(a)hotmail.com> wrote
>
> I've reviewed the proposed legislation and see NO specific prohibition
> about performing sexual acts while driving.
> An oversight?

There was a big court case here in CT last year. Family of a man killed was
suing his girlfriend and said she was driving when they hit a tree. Her
defense? I was not driving at the time. How could I be? I was giving him
a BJ.