From: Phil Bradby on
A few questions that occur to me about fords:

1) Why is the warning sign for fords a worded warning? I'd have thought
that
a) it's easy enough to come up with a picture to illustrate a ford
b) non-English-speaking visitors driving in the UK would be unlikely to
know the word "ford", but prior warning of a ford could be extremely
useful

2) Are there any UK trunk roads with fords? Or other principal A-roads?

3) Are there fords that are usually passable but not if the river is in
spate, and with corresponding permanently-signed diversion routes?

4) Should the L-test make some effort to provide guidance on driving
through fords, e.g. including fords on test routes in areas where there
is a convenient ford close to the test centre?
From: Roger Mills on
In an earlier contribution to this discussion, Phil Bradby
<nospam(a)nospam.com> wrote:
> A few questions that occur to me about fords:
>
> 1) Why is the warning sign for fords a worded warning?


What would like to see - a picture of a Model-T? <g>
--
Cheers,
Roger
_______
Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom
checked.


From: Silk on
On 02/05/2010 22:09, Phil Bradby wrote:
> A few questions that occur to me about fords:

Like why is the new Mondeo so expensive? Oh hang on, you don't mean
Fords, you mean fords.
From: ChelseaTractorMan on
On Sun, 2 May 2010 21:09:06 +0000 (UTC), Phil Bradby
<nospam(a)nospam.com> wrote:

>4) Should the L-test make some effort to provide guidance on driving
>through fords, e.g. including fords on test routes in areas where there
>is a convenient ford close to the test centre?

I would say no as there are few fords to use as tests. I cannot think
of one on a major road. As for the signs, yes, it should be a graphic
of a car with wheels in water. "ford" will mean "Ford" to most non
english speakers!
--
Mike. .. .
Gone beyond the ultimate driving machine.
From: Douglas Payne on
Phil Bradby wrote:
> A few questions that occur to me about fords:
>
> 1) Why is the warning sign for fords a worded warning? I'd have thought
> that
> a) it's easy enough to come up with a picture to illustrate a ford

If you think there should be a picture instead of roadsigns, what is the
picture for 'Kidderminister' or 'Diversion' going to be?

> b) non-English-speaking visitors driving in the UK would be unlikely to
> know the word "ford", but prior warning of a ford could be extremely
> useful

If foreign drivers do not know what a red triangle means, or that a
river/stream running across a road could be hazardous and/or do not take
the time to read a little about road signage in a country they are
driving in, that is their lookout as far as I am concerned.

It's not like it is difficult to find out what it means, and I imagine
that after the first encounter, it would be pretty obvious.

I suspect that fords are uncommon enough for it not to be a problem.
Less of a problem than people thinking up reasons to put up even more
signs when they are not needed.

--
Douglas