From: AstraVanMann on 29 Jan 2010 16:12 "Adrian" <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote: > My NCB is untouched. It's down as not-at-fault. BUT - it's a claim > involving my car, which affects my risk. Apparently. I guess the theory behind it is that one more incident involving a third party hitting your car when parked means that the chances are slightly higher of you needing to claim on your own insurance as a result of someone doing it and not leaving their details. Or something. -- "For want of the price of tea and a slice, the old man died."
From: IanT on 29 Jan 2010 17:46 "Adrian" <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:7se9ppFrp9U1(a)mid.individual.net... > "Miike G" <miktoolman(a)miktoolman.plus.net> gurgled happily, sounding much > like they were saying: > >>> In my case, the other driver's insurance. No arguments from them. > >> Sounds like you need to try a different insurance Co. > > That was common across a large number from a comparison site. You get a better deal by going to the insurance companies direct. Price Comparison sites are great for identity theft and they only promote those who pay most to advertise with them. That is why a number of insurers now refuse to pay the sites and say so on TV. Your premium does not increase if you are not at fault, your NCB might be suspended during an investigation but later reinstated. Not all companies are the same, go with a well known one and you will not be left with misleading terminology that could be misinterpreted.
From: Elder on 30 Jan 2010 15:37 In article <7se9ppFrp9U1(a)mid.individual.net>, toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com says... > "Miike G" <miktoolman(a)miktoolman.plus.net> gurgled happily, sounding much > like they were saying: > > >> In my case, the other driver's insurance. No arguments from them. > > > Sounds like you need to try a different insurance Co. > > That was common across a large number from a comparison site. > I usually change companies every year or two and use cashback sites to get back an changes and sometimes get a profit over the previous year anyway. -- Carl Robson Get cashback on your purchases Topcashback http://www.TopCashBack.co.uk/skraggy_uk/ref/index.htm Greasypalm http://www.greasypalm.co.uk/r/?l=1006553
From: Chris Bartram on 31 Jan 2010 09:10 Miike G wrote: > "Chris Bartram" <news(a)delete-me.piglet-net.net> wrote in message > news:hjst4s$ss3$1(a)news.eternal-september.org... >> Miike G wrote: >> >>> I doubt it. IME 'no fault' accidents, paid for by 3rd parties insurance >>> has no affect on ones premium. >>> >> I beg to differ. SWMBO's insurance went up by �28 when we disclosed the >> (non-fault) accident I had in 2008- I'm a named driver. Mine also went up. > > Maybe my broker only offers me policies from more reputable companies. He > knows I'm not interested in the cheapest. I just don't want any hassle if I > have a claim. Or a penalty for any 'no fault' damage. > Mike. > > I'm with a fairly reputable company, as far as Insurance companies go. I wouldn't imagine Adrian is one to skimp either.
From: Elder on 2 Feb 2010 12:30
In article <7sgpvgFc8aU1(a)mid.individual.net>, douggie(a)cheerful.com says... > Heheh, have you still got some HTC thing? My experience of an HTC touch > and a Parrot BT kit is woeful. Is the bluetooth disabled, or does it > just not work with your phone? (c: No, a Samsung omnia. But it isn't that, it is the car. Click on the phone setting option and it comes back, option unavailable. > > Good things, engine not bad, cruise control excellent, handling smooth > > but a little soggy, perfect for where it is aimed I guess. > > > > Bad things, handbrake lever is too far back, worse even than with the > > Saab 9000 and I have the seat almost all the way back, rear view mirror > > is too low down, even with seat at lowest setting, anything around the > > passenger side front wing doesn't exist. What's with the stupid need to > > have the clutch pressed in to start the engine? > > Like on Saabs of the last 10 years or so? Mate's Chrysler Neon was the > same. Stops 'merkins (and UKians too now probably) starting in gear, > leaping forwards and suing the manufacturer for hitting the car in front. > Newest Saab I've driven was an original 9-3 hatch like Dervies old one and an auto 9-5. Neither of them needed a foot on anything to actually start it, but the auto did have the park/neutral starter lockout. I suppose later ones would have the same options as the insignia if there is any dna between them. -- Carl Robson Get cashback on your purchases Topcashback http://www.TopCashBack.co.uk/skraggy_uk/ref/index.htm Greasypalm http://www.greasypalm.co.uk/r/?l=1006553 |