One in the eye for polluting climate sceptics.
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: Doug on 31 Mar 2010 08:33 Didn't the skeptics make a big fuss about the University of East Anglia emails and they have now been shown to be completely wrong, as usual. "...The Commons Science and Technology Committee criticised UEA authorities for failing to respond to requests for data from climate change sceptics. But it found no evidence Professor Phil Jones, whose e-mails were hacked and published online, had manipulated data. It said his reputation, and that of his climate research unit, remained intact. The e-mails were hacked from the university's computer network and were published on the internet just before the Copenhagen climate conference in December 2009..." Odd coincidence eh? More: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8595483.stm -- UK Radical Campaigns www.zing.icom43.net Travel broadens the damage.
From: Adrian on 31 Mar 2010 08:44 Doug <jagmad(a)riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: > Odd coincidence eh? Mmmm. Who'd have thought it... "Government downplays evidence that disagrees with their stated policies."
From: Doug on 31 Mar 2010 09:22 On 31 Mar, 13:44, Adrian <toomany2...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were > saying: > > > Odd coincidence eh? > > Mmmm. Who'd have thought it... > > "Government downplays evidence that disagrees with their stated policies." > We know how ambivalent the government is about MMGW, with its airport expansions and coal-fired power stations. -- UK Radical Campaigns www.zing.icom43.net "The car, more of a toilet than a convenience".
From: Derek C on 31 Mar 2010 09:23 On 31 Mar, 13:33, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: > Didn't the skeptics make a big fuss about the University of East > Anglia emails and they have now been shown to be completely wrong, as > usual. > > "...The Commons Science and Technology Committee criticised UEA > authorities for failing to respond to requests for data from climate > change sceptics. > > But it found no evidence Professor Phil Jones, whose e-mails were > hacked and published online, had manipulated data. > > It said his reputation, and that of his climate research unit, > remained intact. > > The e-mails were hacked from the university's computer network and > were published on the internet just before the Copenhagen climate > conference in December 2009..." > > Odd coincidence eh? > > More:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8595483.stm > > -- > UK Radical Campaignswww.zing.icom43.net > Travel broadens the damage. The Commons Science and Technology Committee, also found that there had been unreasonable withholding of climate data requested under the Freedom of Information Act by scientists who are sceptical about Anthropenic Global Warming (AGW) or Man Made Climate Change! There was also a conspiracy not to peer review scientific papers that did not conform with the mainstream view on AGW! The Government has its own agenda for using AGW as an excuse for imposing extra 'carbon' taxes on us, and for appeasing the green(washed) lobby. Derek C
From: McKevvy on 31 Mar 2010 09:25
On 31 Mar, 13:33, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: > Didn't the skeptics make a big fuss about the University of East > Anglia emails and they have now been shown to be completely wrong, as > usual. > > "...The Commons Science and Technology Committee criticised UEA > authorities for failing to respond to requests for data from climate > change sceptics. > > But it found no evidence Professor Phil Jones, whose e-mails were > hacked and published online, had manipulated data. > > It said his reputation, and that of his climate research unit, > remained intact. > > The e-mails were hacked from the university's computer network and > were published on the internet just before the Copenhagen climate > conference in December 2009..." > > Odd coincidence eh? > > More:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/8595483.stm > He also went on to criticise the Prof for not publishing his complete data sets. As someone who has a science background this is bending the truth, to put it lightly. McK. |