Prev: Grumble
Next: recreational driving
From: Halmyre on 16 Apr 2010 11:10 In article <82rcdhFp1kU1(a)mid.individual.net>, miktoolman(a)miktoolman.plus.com says... > > "Adrian" <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:82r6t9Ft3U21(a)mid.individual.net... > > "Mortimer" <me(a)privacy.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were > > saying: > > > >> Assuming that the engine capacity is the same, is there any advantage of > >> a V4 engine over an in-line engine? > > > > Packaging is the main one. > > > >> Do V engines run more or less smoothly than in-line or boxer > >> (horizontally-opposed) engines? > > I would say less. > > > Depends on the crank construction and the vee angle. Just think of a flat > > engine as just a 180deg vee. > > AFAIA a flat or straight engine is more balanced than a V configuration. The > V 4 Ford engine, frinstance, needed a countershaft to run smoothly. > Mike. > > > Some V engines are perfectly balanced - V12 and V16 I think. There's a comprehensive article here: http://www.autozine.org/technical_school/engine/smooth1.htm -- Halmyre This is the most powerful sigfile in the world and will probably blow your head clean off.
From: Adrian on 16 Apr 2010 11:23 Halmyre <no.spam(a)this.address> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: > There's a comprehensive article here: > > http://www.autozine.org/technical_school/engine/smooth1.htm Can you warn me before posting stuff like that? That's both bloody fascinating and seriously head-hurty.
From: Nick Finnigan on 16 Apr 2010 12:40 Mortimer wrote: > Assuming that the engine capacity is the same, is there any advantage of > a V4 engine over an in-line engine? Do V engines run more or less > smoothly than in-line or boxer (horizontally-opposed) engines? I realise Boxers are best, much better than even a Mitsubishi balanced inline. > that V engines are often used to reduce the size of engine compartment > needed, by reducing the length because left and right bank cylinders can > overlap and by reducing the height of the cylinder block because it's > tilted over. > > There was a fashion for V4 engines (Ford Corsair, Saab 96) in the 1960s > but you don't find them nowadays. Once you have managed inline & transverse, there's no real point in a V4.
From: Dave Plowman on 16 Apr 2010 18:44
In article <82rcdhFp1kU1(a)mid.individual.net>, Mike G <miktoolman(a)miktoolman.plus.com> wrote: > AFAIA a flat or straight engine is more balanced than a V configuration. > The V 4 Ford engine, frinstance, needed a countershaft to run smoothly. Depends on the angle, IIRC, and the Ford version was designed to be machined on the same equipment as their V-6. But some in line fours have balance shafts too. In line sixes need a torsional vibration damper. -- *Give me ambiguity or give me something else. Dave Plowman dave(a)davesound.co.uk London SW 12 |