From: T.J. Higgins on
In article <14y7x40tlqu4y.17koe9hputfy8$.dlg(a)40tude.net>, richard wrote:
>On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:21:17 -0700 (PDT), Harry K wrote:
>>
>> Washington state just woke up. The bill making hand held CP use a
>> primary infraction was signed yesterday. It, of course, will do no
>> good. What is needed is a circuit in every phone that makes it
>> inoperable except for 911 if moving over x mph.
>
>and how would the cp know the speed of the car?

You're kidding, right?

Your CP already knows your location. Speed is change of location
over time.


--
TJH

tjhiggin.at.hiwaay.dot.net
From: Josh on
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:44:04 -0500,
ernest.p.worrell(a)vernal.equinox.edu (T.J. Higgins) wrote:

>In article <14y7x40tlqu4y.17koe9hputfy8$.dlg(a)40tude.net>, richard wrote:
>>On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:21:17 -0700 (PDT), Harry K wrote:
>>>
>>> Washington state just woke up. The bill making hand held CP use a
>>> primary infraction was signed yesterday. It, of course, will do no
>>> good. What is needed is a circuit in every phone that makes it
>>> inoperable except for 911 if moving over x mph.
>>
>>and how would the cp know the speed of the car?
>
>You're kidding, right?
>
>Your CP already knows your location. Speed is change of location
>over time.

And how does it know that you're in the driver's seat, and not a
passenger (who can use their phone completely legally and safely, and
there's absolutely no reason to prevent)?

Josh

From: T.J. Higgins on
In article <ojkqq59q3hf74skgb4ninp8iqp0fvvcm87(a)4ax.com>, Josh wrote:
>On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:44:04 -0500,
>ernest.p.worrell(a)vernal.equinox.edu (T.J. Higgins) wrote:
>
>>In article <14y7x40tlqu4y.17koe9hputfy8$.dlg(a)40tude.net>, richard wrote:
>>>On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:21:17 -0700 (PDT), Harry K wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Washington state just woke up. The bill making hand held CP use a
>>>> primary infraction was signed yesterday. It, of course, will do no
>>>> good. What is needed is a circuit in every phone that makes it
>>>> inoperable except for 911 if moving over x mph.
>>>
>>>and how would the cp know the speed of the car?
>>
>>You're kidding, right?
>>
>>Your CP already knows your location. Speed is change of location
>>over time.
>
>And how does it know that you're in the driver's seat, and not a
>passenger (who can use their phone completely legally and safely, and
>there's absolutely no reason to prevent)?

Well that's a completely different question. And far more
valid and intelligent than your original one.

--
TJH

tjhiggin.at.hiwaay.dot.net
From: Ad absurdum per aspera on
[Why truck trailers have a steel bar hanging down at the rear]

> >http://www.ktla.com/news/landing/ktla-5-freeway-fatal-crash,0,66991.s...
> > HTF do you not see these huge obstructions directly in front of you?

> Ummm...looking to see if you 'texted' correctly?

My somewhat uncharitable first thought upon seeing the LA Times photo
of the accident scene was that a cellphone or similar distraction
might have been involved.

Then I noticed that the truck was broken down in a traffic lane and
the time was quarter past four in the morning, not exactly an hour
when I'm on top of my game either. Not excuses -- road hazards could
be anywhere, and it is generally the duty of the driver behind to "see
and avoid" -- but certainly complicating factors.

The hours when you have a mix of people who've been up all night and
people who aren't quite up yet, which also usually happen to be hours
of darkness, are *not* my favorite time to be on the road.

--Joe
From: Matthew Russotto on
In article <eef38118-02c3-47a7-a420-2349d0199bc1(a)l40g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,
Harry K <turnkey4099(a)hotmail.com> wrote:

>Washington state just woke up. The bill making hand held CP use a
>primary infraction was signed yesterday. It, of course, will do no
>good. What is needed is a circuit in every phone that makes it
>inoperable except for 911 if moving over x mph.

Fails to account for passengers, whether in a car or another vehicle.
--
The problem with socialism is there's always
someone with less ability and more need.