From: Harry Bloomfield on 26 May 2010 18:23 A 2004 facelift Connoisseur SE CDTI with most all of the options. It felt and looks a little smaller than my current motor, but then it is supposed to do 2.5x the mpg at motorway cruising speeds that my current one does. Mileage was a good bit higher than intended, but they seem to have been mostly motorway miles. Now I need a tow bar and electrics fitting. -- Regards, Harry (M1BYT) (L) http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk
From: Ret. on 26 May 2010 18:39 Harry Bloomfield wrote: > A 2004 facelift Connoisseur SE CDTI with most all of the options. It > felt and looks a little smaller than my current motor, but then it is > supposed to do 2.5x the mpg at motorway cruising speeds that my > current one does. Mileage was a good bit higher than intended, but > they seem to have been mostly motorway miles. > > Now I need a tow bar and electrics fitting. Glad you liked it Harry. I'm sure that you wont be disappointed. You have the same year and trim level as mine (although mine is an estate). I had a towbar with a removable tow-ball fitted. I think it was well worth the bit extra to be able to remove it when not towing. Adrian will be very disappointed... -- Kev
From: Steve Firth on 27 May 2010 02:30 Harry Bloomfield <harry.m1byt(a)NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk> wrote: > A 2004 facelift Connoisseur SE CDTI with most all of the options. Wow, �1500 worth of car. How much did you pay?
From: Adrian on 27 May 2010 04:23 bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>> Not at all. Whatever floats your boat. If you're happy to drive a >>> mediocre car, that's your choice. >> I'm not going to get drawn in. > I would class most cars as 'mediocre'. If the person likes an average > car, that' all that matters. We can't all afford Ferraris. Do you really think that the kind of teenage-boy stats better suited to a game of "Top Trumps" are the only difference between a mediocre car and a good one?
From: bod on 27 May 2010 04:27
Adrian wrote: > bod <bodron57(a)tiscali.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were > saying: > >>>> Not at all. Whatever floats your boat. If you're happy to drive a >>>> mediocre car, that's your choice. > >>> I'm not going to get drawn in. > >> I would class most cars as 'mediocre'. If the person likes an average >> car, that' all that matters. We can't all afford Ferraris. > > Do you really think that the kind of teenage-boy stats better suited to a > game of "Top Trumps" are the only difference between a mediocre car and a > good one? > > No. Bod |