From: chuckcar on
jim beam <me(a)privacy.net> wrote in
news:L_mdnanU9JXseM_RnZ2dnUVZ_sadnZ2d(a)speakeasy.net:

> i don't usually post political bull, but this just pisses me off.
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100730/ap_on_bi_ge/us_obama
>
> $25 billion under bush
> $60 billion under obama
>
You're saying the US gave $85B to GM alone?

> to save 55,000 jobs? [note: use of the word "added" is a
> technicality.
> old g.m. were dissolved. "new" g.m.'s re-staffing is classified as
> "added" when it's really a sideways - in fact downward - employment
> curve.]
>
> let's do the math:
>
> $85MMM / 55,000 = 1.5MM per job.
>
> that stinks.
>
> write your representatives. this ridiculous profigacy deserves
> punishment. especially as all g.m.'s projected "job growth" is slated
> for china, not the u.s.
>
Better than giving it all to rich bankers. Do I *have* to say why?




--
(setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )