JD Power APEAL Survey: Toyota ranked next to last, Honda, Nissan below average
in [Technical]
|
Prev: JD Power APEAL Survey: Toyota ranked next to last, Honda, Nissan below average
Next: JD Power APEAL Survey: Toyota ranked next to last, Honda,Nissan below average
From: chuckcar on 18 Jul 2010 06:54 john <johngdole(a)hotmail.com> wrote in news:0a89c99a-88f0-4b34-b02c-5a97c8ef728c(a)q21g2000prm.googlegroups.com: > "Just as in the 2009 APEAL study, all three Japanese mass market > brands � Toyota, Honda and Nissan -- scored below the industry > average. In this year�s study, Toyota also ranked next to last, just > ahead of Jeep. > > The "report card showed the Detroit Three automakers catching and, in > some cases, surpassing Asian and Europe competitors as the domestic > brands, on average, outscored import brands for the first time in 13 > years. > > The Automotive Performance, Execution and Layout (APEAL) Study > received 76,000 consumers� assessments on about 80 criteria after > driving their 2010 model vehicles for three months. Power researchers > collected responses between February and May of this year, added the > scores and ranked 33 brands on a 1,000-point scale. > > http://www.freep.com/article/20100715/BUSINESS01/100715036/1210/BUSINES > S01/U.S.-automotive-brands-outpace-rivals-in-new-J.D.-Power-survey > I think very little of anyone who can't properly spell appeal. -- (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
From: Tegger on 18 Jul 2010 11:16 "E. Meyer" <epmeyer50(a)msn.com> wrote in news:C8687B93.1D9A8%epmeyer50(a)msn.com: >> > > I wonder how much GM paid for that "study". > > GM didn't have to pay anything. Barack simply made a few phone calls, and... -- Tegger
From: chuckcar on 18 Jul 2010 16:11 Tegger <invalid(a)invalid.inv> wrote in news:Xns9DB972BD6C61Ctegger(a)208.90.168.18: > "E. Meyer" <epmeyer50(a)msn.com> wrote in > news:C8687B93.1D9A8%epmeyer50(a)msn.com: > > >>> >> >> I wonder how much GM paid for that "study". >> >> > > > > GM didn't have to pay anything. Barack simply made a few phone calls, > and... > Got hung up on numerous times because he wasn't in the "old boys network". -- (setq (chuck nil) car(chuck) )
From: Scott Dorsey on 18 Jul 2010 17:37 In article <Xns9DB9A3EFC9D7Achuck(a)127.0.0.1>, chuckcar <chuck(a)nil.car> wrote: >Tegger <invalid(a)invalid.inv> wrote in >news:Xns9DB972BD6C61Ctegger(a)208.90.168.18: > >> "E. Meyer" <epmeyer50(a)msn.com> wrote in >> news:C8687B93.1D9A8%epmeyer50(a)msn.com: >> >>> I wonder how much GM paid for that "study". >> >> GM didn't have to pay anything. Barack simply made a few phone calls, >> and... >> >Got hung up on numerous times because he wasn't in the "old boys >network". Guys, take a look at what the study is and how it was conducted. It's even less useful than the rest of the Powers surveys, but don't go pointing fingers at a survey that basically asks random people vague questions about how much they like car makers. You ask questions that don't mean anything, you get answers that don't mean anything either. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
From: Hachiroku ハチロク on 18 Jul 2010 21:15
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:37:30 -0400, Scott Dorsey wrote: > In article <Xns9DB9A3EFC9D7Achuck(a)127.0.0.1>, chuckcar <chuck(a)nil.car> wrote: >>Tegger <invalid(a)invalid.inv> wrote in >>news:Xns9DB972BD6C61Ctegger(a)208.90.168.18: >> >>> "E. Meyer" <epmeyer50(a)msn.com> wrote in >>> news:C8687B93.1D9A8%epmeyer50(a)msn.com: >>> >>>> I wonder how much GM paid for that "study". >>> >>> GM didn't have to pay anything. Barack simply made a few phone calls, >>> and... >>> >>Got hung up on numerous times because he wasn't in the "old boys >>network". > > Guys, take a look at what the study is and how it was conducted. It's > even less useful than the rest of the Powers surveys, but don't go pointing > fingers at a survey that basically asks random people vague questions about > how much they like car makers. > > You ask questions that don't mean anything, you get answers that don't > mean anything either. > --scott Q: if today is Sunday, what color is your underwear? |