From: Noddy on 30 Sep 2009 00:34
<OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message
> Your english really is a problem eh!
> Did you notice the "enjoy"
> I like being here Nod...You dance like no other!
If anyone's doing any "dancing" around here pal, it ain't me :)
From: Noddy on 30 Sep 2009 08:23
"Dyna Soar" <dynasoar..REMOVE..THIS..(a)ozdebate.com> wrote in message
> Always knew you had no sense of humour, Bazza.
Oh, he does. He thinks Jaguar make a great car :)
From: Noddy on 30 Sep 2009 19:20
<user(a)domain.invalid> wrote in message
> if you say so , personally I think your casting your pearls on a swine's
> throat and should save them for a higher class pig either way I wont be
> reading the thread at all
From: D Walford on 2 Oct 2009 02:30
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:30:50 +1000, D Walford
> <dwalford(a)internode.on.net> wrote:
>> hippo wrote:
>>> There is no way a Minor or 1800 exhaust manifold could be considered a
>>> performance product, much as I like both vehicles. (It gets worse. I've
>>> owned four Saabs and a Herald as well.) "MoWoG" per se indicates *nothing*
>>> specifically about special tuning product, which was just as likely either
>>> to be uncoded or given an Abingdon specific branding. Cheers
>> That's the way I remember it, if MoWog means special tuning parts then
>> every BMC car I've owned or worked on was full of special tuning parts.
> Actually Daryl, You need to try a little harder.
> MoWoG does not mean special tuning parts...and I never said anything
> like that.
Maybe you should try harder to be more clear because that's the way it
read to me.