Prev: To solve our health problem DON'T TRUST CHEMICAL PHARMA DRUGS PUSHERS QUACKS ... as simple as that BLOODY JENNER & PASTEUR SUPERSTITIONS HOOKED RETARDS !
Next: Water Car
From: 380VRX on 18 Apr 2010 19:23 when it was released it had 4 wheel disc brakes standard accross the range and they were rated very highly for reliability over holden and ford
From: Dingo on 18 Apr 2010 20:16 On Sun, 18 Apr 2010 16:23:24 -0700 (PDT), 380VRX <mmal380vrx(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >when it was released it had 4 wheel disc brakes standard accross the >range and they were rated very highly for reliability over holden and >ford Your grammar and spelling is rubbish, just like your opinions. Also please learn to Capitalise where necessary.
From: Clocky on 18 Apr 2010 20:19 380VRX wrote: > when it was released it had 4 wheel disc brakes standard accross the > range and they were rated very highly for reliability over holden and > ford Actually they weren't. Those autos were a dog and the engines were sluggish fuel guzzlers with timing chain issues... and that's when they were new...
From: hippo on 18 Apr 2010 20:24 380VRX wrote: > > when it was released it had 4 wheel disc brakes standard accross the > range and they were rated very highly for reliability over holden and > ford > > So did the Renault 8 in the early 1960s! -- Posted at www.usenet.com.au
From: 380VRX on 18 Apr 2010 20:32
On Apr 19, 10:19 am, "Clocky" <notg...(a)happen.com> wrote: > 380VRX wrote: > > when it was released it had 4 wheel disc brakes standard accross the > > range and they were rated very highly for reliability over holden and > > ford > > Actually they weren't. Those autos were a dog and the engines were sluggish > fuel guzzlers with timing chain issues... and that's when they were new.... all lies |