rudds gone
in [Aussie Drivers]
|
From: Ted on 21 Jun 2010 06:37 "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote in message news:4c1df16c$0$78846$c30e37c6(a)exi-reader.telstra.net... > As much as I can't stand Rudd, I'd sooner vote to have him re-elected than > hand the reigns over to Abbott. > > -- > Regards, > Noddy. Well Said
From: Toby on 21 Jun 2010 06:48 On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 20:07:20 +0930, Ted wrote: > "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote in message > news:4c1df16c$0$78846$c30e37c6(a)exi-reader.telstra.net... > >> As much as I can't stand Rudd, I'd sooner vote to have him re-elected than >> hand the reigns over to Abbott. >> >> -- >> Regards, >> Noddy. > > > Well Said Umm... How long is it since .au had a mick prime minister, anyway? -- Toby "Governments need armies to protect them against their enslaved and oppressed subjects." - Leo Tolstoi
From: John_H on 21 Jun 2010 07:05 Toby wrote: > >Umm... How long is it since .au had a mick prime minister, anyway? Immediately prior to that fine upstanding protty, John Howard! :) -- John H
From: atec7 7 ""atec77" on 21 Jun 2010 10:22 Athol wrote: > The one thing that really distinguishes the Labor and Liberal parties is > the fact that labor members can be ejected from the party, disowned etc. > simply for crossing the floor and voting according to their conscience, > and it's a big deal if the party leadership give their members permission > for a conscience vote. OTOH, the Liberal Party always gives their members > that right, even if it's frowned upon. Regardless of how much pressure > might be exerted to make a member tow the party line, the Liberal Party > won't expel a member for voting according to their conscience. > > I believe that, in spite of Abbott's right leanings, the moderates within > the coalition in parliament would prevent his more radical ideas from > causing problems. > > His propensity to make policy announcements without party consultation is > his biggest problem, IMO. > > Hocking threw his chance by backing the unbackable energy taxation scam > err ETS. The planet continues to fail to follow the warmist script, the > ETS wouldn't have any effect on CO2 emissions anyway, and those who are > still in favour of the ETS are tainted by it. Until he makes a statement > unequivocably rejecting the entire concept of an ETS as proposed, Hocking > will not be a viable leader. > In some commentary this evening on tv Robert Gotleibson (spelling)( an economist in one of the papers) said quite a lot about this subject which basically amounted to krudd has stuffed up 300 billion of future investment which when well publicised cost thousands of jobs + billion in infrastructure and his seat , Krudd might get lucky and create a miracle but according the Bob he has fubared badly over the tax and has little time to fix it I still expect a change from the simple fact krudd has failure by the nuts and is dragging it down to his level Assuming the Libs can control Tonys lack of project management and nullify his off the cuff speaking it's almost a shoe in
From: Noddy on 21 Jun 2010 18:50
"Athol" <athol_SPIT_SPAM(a)idl.net.au> wrote in message news:1277121845.915812(a)idlwebserver.idl.com.au... > His propensity to make policy announcements without party consultation is > his biggest problem, IMO. That and the fact that he has an incredibly bad temper and when put under pressure he has a propensity to explode in a rage. Faced with a barage of heavy media questions about some unpopular subject he's very likely to blow up and shoot himself straight in the head. > Hocking threw his chance by backing the unbackable energy taxation scam > err ETS. The planet continues to fail to follow the warmist script, the > ETS wouldn't have any effect on CO2 emissions anyway, and those who are > still in favour of the ETS are tainted by it. Until he makes a statement > unequivocably rejecting the entire concept of an ETS as proposed, Hocking > will not be a viable leader. Unless Abbott gets in and really makes a mess, in which case people will very quickly forget about Joe's views on the ETS (if they haven't already). -- Regards, Noddy. |