Another killer driver smashes a shop and kills a boy.
in [UK Drivers]
|
From: Tony (UncleFista) on 19 May 2010 04:36 "Doug" <jagmad(a)riseup.net> wrote in message news:62c873a9-0c94-4095-8d2c-b8bc47bf141f(a)h11g2000vbo.googlegroups.com... > Once again demonstrating the sheer deadly destructiveness of RELIGION I fixed your post for you Duhhhg, as reported, he died because he'd not joined the 21st century and thought his god was going to save him. It didn't happen and refusing blood due to him being a Jehova's witless killed him, the car only hurt him.....
From: Adrian on 19 May 2010 04:39 "Tony \(UncleFista\)" <unclefista(a)SPAMMENOTblueyonder.co.uk> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >> Once again demonstrating the sheer deadly destructiveness of RELIGION > I fixed your post for you Duhhhg, as reported, he died because he'd not > joined the 21st century and thought his god was going to save him. It > didn't happen and refusing blood due to him being a Jehova's witless > killed him, the car only hurt him..... It's also worth noting that nobody has made any comment to try to absolve the fuckwit who crashed his chavmobile in the first place. But to charge him with a fatality would be monumentally unjust, since the kid effectively committed suicide.
From: GT on 19 May 2010 08:22 "Mike Henry" <{$mrtickle$}@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:jql5v5hscgk7kprp0etlgl4es08637be3f(a)4ax.com... > In <4bf2a63a$0$5897$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com>, "GT" <a(a)b.c> wrote: > >>"Adrian" <toomany2cvs(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >>news:85flhtFgk9U9(a)mid.individual.net... >>> "GT" <a(a)b.c> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying: >>> >>>> In order to have a license to kill, you need to join the forces where >>>> after weapons training + relevant assignment, you will be issued with a >>>> 'license to kill'. >>> >>> <gently> >>> James Bond isn't real, y'know. >> >>:-) >> >>'License to kill' *does* actually exist tho! > > Except that thankfully, it uses the correct English spelling of licence, > and not the American spelling that you seem to have used (for some > reason). > http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097742/ > A great film. Actually, both spellings are valid and in the OED. Words like 'License' and 'realize' were used widely in English when the Americans adopted/inherited our language. English has since introduced extra (not replacement) spellings for some words, typically because a few people spelled the words wrongly a few times and the masses followed suit. Eventually everyone was miss-spelling things, so the dictionary 'folk' added the new spellings, like 'licence', 'realise' into the dictionary. Just about all bond films are great.
From: Brimstone on 19 May 2010 09:02 "GT" <a(a)b.c> wrote in message news:4bf3df6d$0$11860$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... > No doug, its your opinion that drivers should be allowed to commit murder > legally - you say so in your signature. Doug's signature, "A driving > licence is a licence to kill."!! Get your facts straight. If Doug did that he wouldn't be Doug.
From: GT on 19 May 2010 09:05
"Brimstone" <brimstone(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:jtKdnWlhO7ngfG7WnZ2dnUVZ7t2dnZ2d(a)bt.com... > "GT" <a(a)b.c> wrote in message > news:4bf3df6d$0$11860$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... > >> No doug, its your opinion that drivers should be allowed to commit murder >> legally - you say so in your signature. Doug's signature, "A driving >> licence is a licence to kill."!! Get your facts straight. > If Doug did that he wouldn't be Doug. lol |