Prev: For all those Facebookers who don't like England Flags on cars..
Next: Yet another pavement killing, by police this time.
From: Brimstone on 5 Jun 2010 03:16 "FrengaX" <hnkjqrh02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message news:7f6e8db8-993c-465d-b375-81b205fb9810(a)j8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... > On Jun 5, 6:12 am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: >> Probably tired of having their lives put at risk by dangerous drivers. >> >> "Stone-throwing Shrewsbury children shatter car window >> >> A driver had a "lucky escape" after her windscreen was shattered by >> children who threw a rock at her car. >> >> The motorist was driving along Robertson Way in Shrewsbury at 1235 BST >> on Thursday when she spotted three children hiding in bushes. >> >> Moments later she spotted one throwing a stone at her car, which >> shattered the windscreen, say West Mercia Police. >> >> The driver was able to stop safely. A force spokesman said: "This was >> an extremely foolish and dangerous act." >> >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/shropshire/10237321.stm > > Now I know you really are sick, and just a ghoulish freak. Actually, I > find your comment thouroughly objectionalble and in extremely poor > taste. I think any sensible person will agree with you. > I had a friend who was killed becuase some yobbo youth lobbed a > brick through his windscreen for no reason as he drove down the road. My sympathies, but Doug approves of violence. > Why do you think that this behaviour is somehow justified for some > totally speculative (and I am pretty certain incorrect) reason. Doug has put himself in danger and been injured in the past so he now has a hatred for cars and their drivers. However, this has only come about since he was told to stop driving for medical reasons. > Oh, and what has this got to do with cycling? Why the unnecessary > cross-post? Because, according to Doug, uk.rec.cycling is infested with motorists.
From: The Medway Handyman on 5 Jun 2010 16:57 Brimstone wrote: > "FrengaX" <hnkjqrh02(a)sneakemail.com> wrote in message > news:7f6e8db8-993c-465d-b375-81b205fb9810(a)j8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... >> On Jun 5, 6:12 am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: >>> Probably tired of having their lives put at risk by dangerous >>> drivers. "Stone-throwing Shrewsbury children shatter car window >>> >>> A driver had a "lucky escape" after her windscreen was shattered by >>> children who threw a rock at her car. >>> >>> The motorist was driving along Robertson Way in Shrewsbury at 1235 >>> BST on Thursday when she spotted three children hiding in bushes. >>> >>> Moments later she spotted one throwing a stone at her car, which >>> shattered the windscreen, say West Mercia Police. >>> >>> The driver was able to stop safely. A force spokesman said: "This >>> was an extremely foolish and dangerous act." >>> >>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/shropshire/10237321.stm >> >> Now I know you really are sick, and just a ghoulish freak. Actually, >> I find your comment thouroughly objectionalble and in extremely poor >> taste. > > I think any sensible person will agree with you. > >> I had a friend who was killed becuase some yobbo youth lobbed a >> brick through his windscreen for no reason as he drove down the road. > > My sympathies, but Doug approves of violence. > >> Why do you think that this behaviour is somehow justified for some >> totally speculative (and I am pretty certain incorrect) reason. > > Doug has put himself in danger and been injured in the past so he now > has a hatred for cars and their drivers. However, this has only come > about since he was told to stop driving for medical reasons. > >> Oh, and what has this got to do with cycling? Why the unnecessary >> cross-post? > > Because, according to Doug, uk.rec.cycling is infested with motorists. Which is because Doug deliberately cross posts to gain attention, then whinges about it. -- Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike is a kid's toy, not a viable form of transport.
From: The Medway Handyman on 5 Jun 2010 16:58 Doug wrote: > On 5 June, 07:29, FrengaX <hnkjqr...(a)sneakemail.com> wrote: >> On Jun 5, 6:12 am, Doug <jag...(a)riseup.net> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Probably tired of having their lives put at risk by dangerous >>> drivers. >> >>> "Stone-throwing Shrewsbury children shatter car window >> >>> A driver had a "lucky escape" after her windscreen was shattered by >>> children who threw a rock at her car. >> >>> The motorist was driving along Robertson Way in Shrewsbury at 1235 >>> BST on Thursday when she spotted three children hiding in bushes. >> >>> Moments later she spotted one throwing a stone at her car, which >>> shattered the windscreen, say West Mercia Police. >> >>> The driver was able to stop safely. A force spokesman said: "This >>> was an extremely foolish and dangerous act." >> >>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/shropshire/10237321.stm >> >> Now I know you really are sick, and just a ghoulish freak. Actually, >> I find your comment thouroughly objectionalble and in extremely poor >> taste. I had a friend who was killed becuase some yobbo youth lobbed >> a brick through his windscreen for no reason as he drove down the >> road. Why do you think that this behaviour is somehow justified for >> some totally speculative (and I am pretty certain incorrect) reason. >> > In the early days of motoring angry villagers used to throw stones at > passing cars so the kids are merely following an old tradition. >> >> Oh, and what has this got to do with cycling? Why the unnecessary >> cross-post? >> > Because motorists frequently post disparaging comments on the cycling > newsgroup so I merely reciprocate. You deliberately cross post fuckwit. I'm only here because of your cross posting. Well done. -- Dave - intelligent enough to realise that a push bike is a kid's toy, not a viable form of transport.
From: jamesd1974 on 5 Jun 2010 18:04 "Doug" <jagmad(a)riseup.net> wrote in message news:f1b97043-e847-495d-882c-fccfd6d95567(a)u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com... > Probably tired of having their lives put at risk by dangerous drivers. > > "Stone-throwing Shrewsbury children shatter car window > > A driver had a "lucky escape" after her windscreen was shattered by > children who threw a rock at her car. > > The motorist was driving along Robertson Way in Shrewsbury at 1235 BST > on Thursday when she spotted three children hiding in bushes. > > Moments later she spotted one throwing a stone at her car, which > shattered the windscreen, say West Mercia Police. > > The driver was able to stop safely. A force spokesman said: "This was > an extremely foolish and dangerous act." > if she had been blinded by broken glass and then inadvertently hit and killed a cyclist would the death have been her fault?, and if so, how? james ( I know what your answer is going to be, I'm just wondering how you're going to twist it so she would be to blame)
From: Tony Dragon on 5 Jun 2010 19:08
jamesd1974 wrote: > "Doug" <jagmad(a)riseup.net> wrote in message > news:f1b97043-e847-495d-882c-fccfd6d95567(a)u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com... >> Probably tired of having their lives put at risk by dangerous drivers. >> >> "Stone-throwing Shrewsbury children shatter car window >> >> A driver had a "lucky escape" after her windscreen was shattered by >> children who threw a rock at her car. >> >> The motorist was driving along Robertson Way in Shrewsbury at 1235 BST >> on Thursday when she spotted three children hiding in bushes. >> >> Moments later she spotted one throwing a stone at her car, which >> shattered the windscreen, say West Mercia Police. >> >> The driver was able to stop safely. A force spokesman said: "This was >> an extremely foolish and dangerous act." >> > > if she had been blinded by broken glass and then inadvertently hit and > killed a cyclist would the death have been her fault?, and if so, how? > > james ( I know what your answer is going to be, I'm just wondering how > you're going to twist it so she would be to blame) That's simple, She was driving to fast She was driving a killer vehicle She was a motorist terrorist She could have been using a bicycle She should have been using PT Her journey was not necessarily She was being hypermobile She could have stayed at home and used video conferencing She was driving a car weapon She was not a 'vulnerable victim' Doug likes violent protest It's the fault of 'Hitlarian motorways@ The victim has rights She was not going to a free 'green festival' She was not an 'art' -- Tony Dragon |