From: JackH on 4 Mar 2010 18:49 On Mar 4, 10:51 pm, %ste...(a)malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: > JackH <jackhacket...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > Come on, tell us all about the '12p a litre' fuel differential you > > felt was worthy of mentioning? :-D > > That was a quote T'was you who decided to quote it - you obviously felt it was something to bolster your argument regarding the economics of owning a diesel and yet it was flawed, wrong and therefore irrelevant in any sense other than to illustrate you're a bit of a retard who doesn't do his homework before posting. HTH -- JackH
From: Steve Firth on 5 Mar 2010 13:38 JackH <jackhackettuk(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > On Mar 4, 10:51 pm, %ste...(a)malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: > > JackH <jackhacket...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > Come on, tell us all about the '12p a litre' fuel differential you > > > felt was worthy of mentioning? :-D > > > > That was a quote > > T'was you who decided to quote it - you obviously felt it was > something to bolster your argument regarding the economics of owning a > diesel and yet it was flawed, wrong and therefore irrelevant in any > sense other than to illustrate you're a bit of a retard who doesn't do > his homework before posting. <sigh> I could have butchered the quote to omit parts superseded by the passage of time. I suspect that you'd have been crying "foul" then as well. In general when one quotes something one quotes it verbatim. As you well know, but you're on one of your missions, again, I see. What the quote did show was that the claim of you and others that the *average* price differential diesel-petrol was "less than �1k" was arong and that your claims about payback time were wrong as well. And in later posts you proved that you are mathematically illiterate. Quelle surprise.
From: JackH on 5 Mar 2010 21:16 On Mar 5, 6:38 pm, %ste...(a)malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: > JackH <jackhacket...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > On Mar 4, 10:51 pm, %ste...(a)malloc.co.uk (Steve Firth) wrote: > > > JackH <jackhacket...(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > > > > Come on, tell us all about the '12p a litre' fuel differential you > > > > felt was worthy of mentioning? :-D > > > > That was a quote > > > T'was you who decided to quote it - you obviously felt it was > > something to bolster your argument regarding the economics of owning a > > diesel and yet it was flawed, wrong and therefore irrelevant in any > > sense other than to illustrate you're a bit of a retard who doesn't do > > his homework before posting. > > <sigh> 'If I keep twisting and turning, I'll muddy the waters enough and get myself off the hook' I proved your initial statement wrong by giving two examples of mid range cars whereby the difference between the respective petrol and diesel models was / is nowhere near £2k. If I was *really* bored, I could reel off loads more examples which disprove that figure, *and* I've already acknowledged that certain types of car will almost certainly have a higher differential than £2k. I also then went a stage further and pointed out that the initial purchase difference is offset by the resale value of the cars concerned, illustrating how in the example relating to Mk4 Golfs. You seem to want to dispute the figures I gave in said examples, but don't appear to want to actually show where the calculations I made were wrong - funny that, eh. You've then, when picked up on some flawed shite you've quoted from where, no-one actually knows because you were too senile to paste the URL for the source concerned as part of the post concerned, gone on to mutter the following: 'That was a quote, from the same article that you wish to believe some of but not all of.' That implies I've read an article and have stated I agree / disagree with some of it - I didn't, but nice try at muddying the waters. T'was you who decided to quote the gem relating to the difference between petrol and diesel being 12p a litre, not me... and others picked you up on it as well. Consider why they did that before coming out with yet more waffle aimed at deflecting attention from the fact you've voluntarily come out with ill informed guff in this thread time and time again and continued to press it even when conclusively proven to be talking out of your shitter. -- JackH
From: JackH on 5 Mar 2010 21:16 On Mar 5, 10:51 pm, Lordy.UK <s...(a)recycle.bin> wrote: > > but you're on one of your missions, again, I see. > > I can't believe you actually wrote that :) I can... ;-) -- JackH
From: Steve Firth on 6 Mar 2010 06:26
JackH <jackhackettuk(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > T'was you who decided to quote the gem relating to the difference > between petrol and diesel being 12p a litre, not me... and others > picked you up on it as well. I quoted the article verbatim, a concept that you don't seem to understand. |