From: Dave Head on 28 Jul 2010 05:07 On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:00:16 -0400, Dave Head <rally2xs(a)att.net> wrote: > >>But there is no real substitute for import tariffs. > >Wikipedia: > >"The overall level tariffs under the Tariff were the second-highest in >US history, exceeded only (by a small margin) by the Tariff of 1828[3] >and the ensuing retaliatory tariffs by U.S. trading partners reduced >American exports and imports by more than half. > >Some economists have opined that the tariffs contributed to the >severity of the Great Depression.[4][5][6]" > >Import tariffs, only if we're into making the same mistake twice. BTW, those were the Smoot-Hawley tariffs of 1930. Reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoot%E2%80%93Hawley_Tariff_Act
From: Dave Head on 28 Jul 2010 05:15 On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 00:52:48 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty <Then-Destroy-Everything(a)Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote: >Government employees get paid more than the private sector. BS. Has never been true either of the 2 places I've worked as an engineer. Any gov't engineer can quit the gov't and have instantly higher salary in the private sector. >> and have to make a profit to boot. That also adds to the cost. Gov't >> workers don't have to produce a profit, just the software. > > >And that's why they waste more and produce nothing. They aren't even >self sufficient. You have no idea what you're talking about.
From: Larry G on 28 Jul 2010 08:04 On Jul 27, 11:07 pm, Dave Head <rally...(a)att.net> wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:36:49 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty > > <Then-Destroy-Everyth...(a)Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote: > >What product does a government employee produce? > > Ones I work with produce software to launch Tomahawk Cruise Missiles. > > >GDP refers to "Producing" > > It is some D valuable software. > > >The economy is measured by it being productive. > > Best way to make this software cost more is to have contractors do it, > who pay more to employees, find every way they can to charge overtime, > and have to make a profit to boot. That also adds to the cost. Gov't > workers don't have to produce a profit, just the software. "productivity" ...believe it or not .. includes re-building homes after a hurricane... or putting in a new highway that is a convenience but not a necessity... and producing thousands of useless military items that got upgraded and no longer used.
From: Larry G on 28 Jul 2010 08:05 On Jul 27, 11:10 pm, Dave Head <rally...(a)att.net> wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 04:27:00 -0700 (PDT), Larry G > > > > > > <gross.la...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >On Jul 26, 7:51 pm, Dave Head <rally...(a)att.net> wrote: > >> On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:18:12 -0700 (PDT), Larry G > > >> <gross.la...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >On Jul 25, 9:02 pm, Dave Head <rally...(a)att.net> wrote: > >> >> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:47:06 -0700 (PDT), Larry G > > >> >> <gross.la...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >On Jul 25, 8:21 pm, "bugo" <wat...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > >> >> >> "Dave Head" <rally...(a)att.net> wrote in message > > >> >> >>news:aijp46ttdd878cl257dl51hj4rt0t6sq0c(a)4ax.com... > > >> >> >> > On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:26:12 -0500, "bugo" <wat...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> >> >> >>"Dave Head" <rally...(a)att.net> wrote in message > >> >> >> >>news:qtgp46d5r4tkanqg29s7vchdueeeeefm17(a)4ax.com... > >> >> >> >>> On Sun, 25 Jul 2010 15:52:23 -0500, "bugo" <wat...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > >> >> >> >>>>"Dave Head" <rally...(a)att.net> wrote in message > >> >> >> >>>>news:0noo46d4ci8f79qqnpbbipgijecti1ufgv(a)4ax.com... > >> >> >> >>>>> Kill the income tax, make everyone prosperous, then they won't need > >> >> >> >>>>> it. > > >> >> >> >>>>I wish I had such a simple, dumbed down, black and white worldview. It > >> >> >> >>>>would be a lot easier than seeing the world as a complex thing. > > >> >> >> >>> Killing the income tax is pretty simple - its a cancer in the economy. > > >> >> >> >>Simplifying the income tax is a great idea. Eliminating it for a sales > >> >> >> >>tax > >> >> >> >>that unfairly overtaxes the poor is criminal. > > >> >> >> > The poor don't pay a penny of Fair Tax. > > >> >> >> Explain. The way I understand, the "fair" tax is a sales tax. Everyone has > >> >> >> to pay a sales tax, and at the same rate. > > >> >> >what exactly is being taxed with the FAIR TAX? > > >> >> The Fair Tax is applied as a sales tax on new items and services sold > >> >> at retail. Things sold at wholesale, or for use in commerce, are not > >> >> taxed. So, Farmer Brown's seed stock for the year is not taxed, nor > >> >> is his tractor. The corn you buy from him is taxed since it is sold > >> >> to you at retail. Every new item and every service, save one, is > >> >> taxed. The only service not taxed is tuition. > > >> >sounds a lot like the GST in Canada and Europe. > > >> Its all here: > > >>www.fairtax.org > > >> if you're interested. Its fairly simple, but the nuances of the > >> effects of the fairly simple system are not, and are not immediatly > >> obvious. I feel that I started really understanding it after looking > >> at different parts of the material for about 2 months. > > >this is a more objective look: > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FairTax > > Pretty voluminous, eh? If you scroll down sufficiently, you'll find > where it says that removal of the income taxes would cause _American_ > manufactured goods to fall by 11.55% at retail. That would be a > significant advantage both at home and in international markets. Its > just one advantage of untaxing corporations. would this be a lot like Obama "promising" a certain unemployment level? heh heh
From: Larry G on 28 Jul 2010 08:08
On Jul 28, 12:52 am, Beam Me Up Scotty <Then-Destroy- Everyth...(a)Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote: > On 7/27/2010 11:07 PM, Dave Head wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:36:49 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty > > <Then-Destroy-Everyth...(a)Blackhole.NebulaX.com> wrote: > >> What product does a government employee produce? > > > Ones I work with produce software to launch Tomahawk Cruise Missiles. > > Yeh I want to buy that product.... BWBBWBBWWWWaahahahahahaha > > >> GDP refers to "Producing" > > > It is some D valuable software. > > What government does is only valuable to Government. Anything > government, can be done better and cheaper by the private sector. > > > > >> The economy is measured by it being productive. > > > Best way to make this software cost more is to have contractors do it, > > who pay more to employees, find every way they can to charge overtime, > > Government employees get paid more than the private sector. > > > and have to make a profit to boot. That also adds to the cost. Gov't > > workers don't have to produce a profit, just the software. > > And that's why they waste more and produce nothing. They aren't even > self sufficient. much of what the govt does is contracted out. but you're really confused about "producing" ..... a 2 liter coke get's "produced" as well as a military canteen. Both items are recorded as part of GDP. a porno film is counted as GDP as well as plastic horns used at soccer matches. kapische? |