Accident update
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: Brown bin day!
Next: Bridge 1:0 Bus
From: NM on 12 Dec 2009 04:23 On 12 Dec, 02:21, Marc <initial.surn...(a)btintenret.com> wrote: > NM wrote: > > On 12 Dec, 01:32, Se or Chris <u...(a)domain.invalid> wrote: > >> JNugent wrote: > > >>> Does his credibility vary depending only on whether it chimes with what > >>> you wish to believe? Surely not? > >> No, his credibility is permanently stuck at zero. The entire episode is > >> a complete fantasy. > > > Evidence for this assertion? > > Your previous messages? Oh! more artistic interpretations, Just get over it, the cyclist fucked up, and has admitted it...... making all you big mouthed cretins wrong, why are you still wriggling around trying to prove black is white.
From: NM on 12 Dec 2009 04:27 On 12 Dec, 09:00, Happi Monday <ha...(a)munday.com> wrote: > NM wrote: > > On 11 Dec, 17:33, Happi Monday <ha...(a)munday.com> wrote: > >> I think you are talking total bollox! (ie. you are making it up). > >> And only a total idiot would admit liabilty. > > > Well he is a cyclist so the pattern fits. > > I do more motoring than cycling - in hour terms, not miles. > I still say you are bullshitting or simply totally self-deluded. As I said to your friend, The cyclist has admitted it, case closed, so it matters little how you care to view the facts. Even when blindingly obvious you still will not admit the cyclist was wrong, you would rather accuse me of lying than admit that.
From: Happi Monday on 12 Dec 2009 08:27 NM wrote: > On 12 Dec, 09:00, Happi Monday <ha...(a)munday.com> wrote: >> NM wrote: >>> On 11 Dec, 17:33, Happi Monday <ha...(a)munday.com> wrote: >>>> I think you are talking total bollox! (ie. you are making it up). >>>> And only a total idiot would admit liabilty. >>> Well he is a cyclist so the pattern fits. >> I do more motoring than cycling - in hour terms, not miles. >> I still say you are bullshitting or simply totally self-deluded. > > As I said to your friend, The cyclist has admitted it, case closed, so > it matters little how you care to view the facts. > > Even when blindingly obvious you still will not admit the cyclist was > wrong, you would rather accuse me of lying than admit that. The problem is, the way you originally presented the "facts", it was totally obvious the driver was responsible. Even after you massaged the facts, it was ambiguous, at best. Of course, it doesn't matter what I think about it, but the fact that you came back asking for an apology tells me you do care what I and others think. I stick to my original assertion that you are lying about the cyclist admitting liability.
From: Happi Monday on 12 Dec 2009 08:30 NM wrote: > On 12 Dec, 02:21, Marc <initial.surn...(a)btintenret.com> wrote: >> NM wrote: >>> On 12 Dec, 01:32, Se or Chris <u...(a)domain.invalid> wrote: >>>> JNugent wrote: >>>>> Does his credibility vary depending only on whether it chimes with what >>>>> you wish to believe? Surely not? >>>> No, his credibility is permanently stuck at zero. The entire episode is >>>> a complete fantasy. >>> Evidence for this assertion? >> Your previous messages? > > Oh! more artistic interpretations, Just get over it, the cyclist > fucked up, and has admitted it. As the facts were presented, the cyclist would have to be a total idiot to admit any wrong-doing, as it was clearly the driver's fault. Of course, that doesn't mean that the cyclist isn't such an idiot - it's just that I don't believe you when you say he's admitted liability.
From: NM on 12 Dec 2009 09:03
On Dec 12, 2:27 pm, Happi Monday <ha...(a)munday.com> wrote: > NM wrote: > > On 12 Dec, 09:00, Happi Monday <ha...(a)munday.com> wrote: > >> NM wrote: > >>> On 11 Dec, 17:33, Happi Monday <ha...(a)munday.com> wrote: > >>>> I think you are talking total bollox! (ie. you are making it up). > >>>> And only a total idiot would admit liabilty. > >>> Well he is a cyclist so the pattern fits. > >> I do more motoring than cycling - in hour terms, not miles. > >> I still say you are bullshitting or simply totally self-deluded. > > > As I said to your friend, The cyclist has admitted it, case closed, so > > it matters little how you care to view the facts. > > > Even when blindingly obvious you still will not admit the cyclist was > > wrong, you would rather accuse me of lying than admit that. > > The problem is, the way you originally presented the "facts", it was > totally obvious the driver was responsible. Even after you massaged the > facts, it was ambiguous, at best. > > Of course, it doesn't matter what I think about it, but the fact that > you came back asking for an apology tells me you do care what I and > others think. > I stick to my original assertion that you are lying about the cyclist > admitting liability. I would expect nothing else. it goes to underline just how bigoted cyclists can be when one of their own is called into question. |