Just a walk in the park.
in [Aussie Drivers]
|
From: OzOne on 17 Jun 2010 21:52 On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:57:57 +0800, "Fraser Johnston" <ftrust(a)iinet.net.au> wrote: >You are trying to compare a 7 figure rescue to an at worst 5 figure one. >Ambulances are covered by private insurance or Medicare which comes from the >taxpayer residing in that country. Your argument has more holes in it than a >colander. > >Fraser > Not comparing anything Fraser....Just wanted the king clown to tell me where the cost line is drawn. What number does HE place on a life? OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on 17 Jun 2010 21:56 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:23:37 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote: >This is a *really* simple and easy to understand issue. > >I'm not saying people who *want* to waste their time by sailing a yacht >around the world shouldn't do it, but that they should contribute towards >the cost of their rescue *if* they should need it. Ozliar is objecting to >that, but as usual he won't paint himself into a corner by stating exactly >what his opinion on the issue actually is. No Nod...all I'm asking is at what dollar cost to you say "bad luck fella..you're on your own, the budget cost to save your life is just too high" You avoid and waffle...when I ask if you've ever costed a helicopter rescue ride, you tell me you don't need to...You have NO idea what any of this costs. > OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on 17 Jun 2010 21:57 On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:44:46 +0800, Neil Gerace <grassynoel(a)iinet.net.au> wrote: >OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com wrote: > >> Bzzzzt! >> Wrong. > >Each person's premium is not supposed to cover the whole cost of that person's claims, because most people won't make a >claim. Indeed...so you rely on others to save your life by contributing to the pool Oh and most importantly you pay an excess. OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on 17 Jun 2010 22:02 On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:13:05 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote: >Go back and read what I said. I've been quite clear, but for some reason you >don't get it. It's completely unclear...You have not answered a single question. > >If she needed an ambulance for example and wasn't a member, she'd have to >pay. In other words, she'd be contributing to the cost of her "rescue". She's 89 and so gets free ambulance.....The public pays for her 'rescue' Should they not pay because in your opinion she's stupid and doesn't deserve the help? > >> Oh and she had dementia..she is NOT stupid. > >She might not be stupid (assuming she's still alive), but the people who let >her roam free certainly are. We tried chaining her to the bed. > >Would that be you by any chance? Yeah....I'm the one who pays a full time carer to live with her...unfortunately that carer needs to bathe and sleep and chaining my MIL up during those time is apparently not legal, Fool. OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace.
From: OzOne on 17 Jun 2010 22:08
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:14:04 +1000, "Noddy" <me(a)home.com> wrote: > ><OzOne(a)Crackerbox-Palace.com> wrote in message >news:d3bd16d8eg4h8s1q1rq4d619g6ht0pif2j(a)4ax.com... > >> So you place no value on your time. > >Ah, so you didn't actually contribute anything in cold hard folding. No, I contributed my valuable time...and didn't get a tax deduction. OzOne of the three twins I welcome you to Crackerbox Palace. |