From: Harry K on
On Feb 17, 7:29 pm, MLOM <gr...(a)netzero.net> wrote:
> On Feb 16, 11:17 pm, Harry K <turnkey4...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 16, 9:00 am, "Paul D. DeRocco" <pdero...(a)ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> > > > "Scott in SoCal" <scottenazt...(a)yahoo.com> wrote
>
> > > >>I think the law should specify that the slower car in the left lane may
> > > >>remain their as long as it's passing other cars with a certain minimum
> > > >>differential, say, 3mph.
>
> > > > A nice idea, but impossible to enforce.
>
> > > No harder than any anti-LLB law. Obviously, a cop has to see you do it, and
> > > then pull you over.
>
> > > --
>
> > > Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
> > > Paul                mailto:pdero...(a)ix.netcom.com
>
> > Yep.  I don't expect much, if any, attention to enforcing the law.  It
> > would come down to a subjective judgement of whether the perp is LLB
> > or passing.
>
> > Harry K
>
> In some locations the cop would be likely to issue two tickets: one
> for LLB and one for speeding.  Got to maximize the fines, you know.
>

Known as "papering the perp"

Harry K