From: Harry K on 18 Feb 2010 00:03 On Feb 17, 7:29 pm, MLOM <gr...(a)netzero.net> wrote: > On Feb 16, 11:17 pm, Harry K <turnkey4...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Feb 16, 9:00 am, "Paul D. DeRocco" <pdero...(a)ix.netcom.com> wrote: > > > > > "Scott in SoCal" <scottenazt...(a)yahoo.com> wrote > > > > >>I think the law should specify that the slower car in the left lane may > > > >>remain their as long as it's passing other cars with a certain minimum > > > >>differential, say, 3mph. > > > > > A nice idea, but impossible to enforce. > > > > No harder than any anti-LLB law. Obviously, a cop has to see you do it, and > > > then pull you over. > > > > -- > > > > Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco > > > Paul mailto:pdero...(a)ix.netcom.com > > > Yep. I don't expect much, if any, attention to enforcing the law. It > > would come down to a subjective judgement of whether the perp is LLB > > or passing. > > > Harry K > > In some locations the cop would be likely to issue two tickets: one > for LLB and one for speeding. Got to maximize the fines, you know. > Known as "papering the perp" Harry K
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Prev: How many of you parents would like the driving age raised to 18? Next: Pre-Emptive Strikes |