Turning around in neighbor's driveway
in [Drive]
|
Prev: Would Consumer Reports say this is a shady practice?
Next: Seat Belt: Will You Get Ticketed If You Show Medical Exemption?
From: � UltraMan � on 2 May 2007 00:24 foaddoc wrote: >> "Kent Wills" <compuelf(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > "There will be NO change in CO2 levels since we exhale carbon monoxide, not carbon dioxide, stupid." -- Kent Wills, geenious ROTFLMAO !! Pure Wills.
From: _ Prof. Jonez _ on 2 May 2007 17:19 Kent Wills wrote: > "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof(a)jonez.net> wrote: > > [various snips for brevity] >> When the jury finds that the person you accused >> of being pregnant is in fact not pregnant, then, ipso facto, >> your initial allegation/charge is false. > If the woman in question had put on a great deal of weight and > was seen shopping in the maternity section of the store, there was > probable cause to believe she was pregnant. That she turned out not > to be pregnant doesn't mean the allegation was false.
From: Kent Wills on 2 May 2007 18:13 As I understand it, on Tue, 1 May 2007 22:24:36 -0600, "� UltraMan �" <ultra(a)man.jp> wrote: His usual dishonest tripe. The man is UNABLE to be honest, no matter what nym he uses. The man is clearly pathological in his dishonesty. Get help, man. Seriously. Your inability to be honest is doing you farm more harm than good. -- Kent Take too many pictures, laugh too much, and love like you've never been hurt because every sixty seconds you spend upset is a minute of happiness you'll never get back
From: _ Prof. Jonez _ on 2 May 2007 21:18 Kent Wills wrote: > As I understand it, on Wed, 2 May 2007 13:33:02 -0600, "_ Prof. Jonez > _" <theprof(a)jonez.net> wrote: > >> >> Did you catch the recent one where he claimed >> that accusing someone of being pregnant - who >> factually isn't pregnant - is _not_ a false accusation >> in Kent's spongiform brain. > > As always, you are being dishonest. Kent Wills wrote: > "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote: > > [various snips for brevity] >> When the jury finds that the person you accused >> of being pregnant is in fact not pregnant, then, ipso facto, >> your initial allegation/charge is false. > If the woman in question had put on a great deal of weight and > was seen shopping in the maternity section of the store, there was > probable cause to believe she was pregnant. That she turned out not > to be pregnant doesn't mean the allegation was false.
From: _ Prof. Jonez _ on 2 May 2007 21:23
Kent Wills wrote: > Where's the proof that atheism is correct? Why do you run and > hide when I ask about it? I will gladly show that your pig-ignorant grotesque perverted superstition that you call christianity is utterly false. > Why, when I gave you the dictionary definition of a valid, > verifiable claim, did you stop posting to the thread? It just illustrated the level of your prevaricating dishonesty. Why don't you hold your superstitious religious claims to the same standard? If you had the honesty to do so then my work would be done. > Time to put up or shut up, stupid. Ok, don't run away this time ... So your Holey Baable is the inerrant revealed word of god himself, eh? |