From: SMS on
John Henderson wrote:

> "These engines use built-in sensors that continually monitor the
> oil quality, making it possible to enjoy reliable and confident
> motoring for up to a maximum of 30,000* miles or 24 months
> (whichever occurs first)".

So what are they sensing? I doubt if their measuring acidity or moisture
content. Maybe they're looking at turbidity with an LED and photosensor.
Further down in that white paper they state the different regimes, and
it seems like the only reason they would need to do this is if the
sensing system can't tell when the oil needs to be changed based on the
oil condition.
From: SMS on
Andy wrote:

> So where is the proof that it hurt catalyitc converters? I'm not
> saying Amsoil doesn't use more ZDDP, just that I don't agree it hurts
> the catalyitic converter.

The automakers demanded the phosphorus limit be put in place by API
because phosphorus will shorten the life of the catalytic converter. The
amount of phosphorus going through the converter depends a lot on how
much oil the engine burns.

See "http://www.aa1car.com/library/converter.htm"

Since there are plenty of synthetics and non-synthetics that meet the
API levels, there is no reason to risk using a non-API certified oil.
From: aarcuda69062 on
In article <dot4139ikdnpedi8mcge6u8hjmjabror1g(a)4ax.com>,
Andy <wisynoil(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 02:08:37 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Note that the other Amsoil products, while they cannot be API certified
> >due to the ZDDP level, do use synthetic base stock. Don't use them in
> >vehicles with catalytic converters, despite what your local MLM person
> >may tell you. Mobil 1 EP does use synthetic base stock.
>
> They have no effect on catalytic converters. I have no idea where you
> came up with that one.

What is "they?"
From: Andy on
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 17:21:47 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com>
wrote:

>Andy wrote:
>
>> So where is the proof that it hurt catalyitc converters? I'm not
>> saying Amsoil doesn't use more ZDDP, just that I don't agree it hurts
>> the catalyitic converter.
>
>The automakers demanded the phosphorus limit be put in place by API
>because phosphorus will shorten the life of the catalytic converter. The
>amount of phosphorus going through the converter depends a lot on how
>much oil the engine burns.
>
>See "http://www.aa1car.com/library/converter.htm"
>
>Since there are plenty of synthetics and non-synthetics that meet the
>API levels, there is no reason to risk using a non-API certified oil.

If you car is burning oil you should get that fixed. The main reason
for using a non-API certifided oil is because the API test is lacking.
After all its brought to you by the same people that say change your
oil at 3,000 miles.
From: Andy on
On Wed, 04 Apr 2007 00:26:02 GMT, aarcuda69062
<nonelson(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>In article <dot4139ikdnpedi8mcge6u8hjmjabror1g(a)4ax.com>,
> Andy <wisynoil(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 02:08:37 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Note that the other Amsoil products, while they cannot be API certified
>> >due to the ZDDP level, do use synthetic base stock. Don't use them in
>> >vehicles with catalytic converters, despite what your local MLM person
>> >may tell you. Mobil 1 EP does use synthetic base stock.
>>
>> They have no effect on catalytic converters. I have no idea where you
>> came up with that one.
>
>What is "they?"

Read the thread.