Prev: New registration plate numbers
Next: Free Auto Motorcycle Trucks Service Repair Owners Manuals Link
From: Dave Plowman (News) on 29 Jul 2010 15:18 In article <xn0gx7vfa1mbaxq000(a)news.eternal-september.org>, steve robinson <steve(a)colevalleyinteriors.co.uk> wrote: > The problem with no gas mig welding is the weld cuts deeper so it > struggles on some of the tissue paper we now call car bodies and > blows through I can do that perfectly well with a gas one. ;-) -- *Someday, we'll look back on this, laugh nervously and change the subject Dave Plowman dave(a)davenoise.co.uk London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound.
From: T i m on 29 Jul 2010 16:09 On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:18:13 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)" <dave(a)davenoise.co.uk> wrote: >In article <ujh3561dngvr4lfnjfuqv2va02rl7nonar(a)4ax.com>, > T i m <news(a)spaced.me.uk> wrote: >> >> Was there noticeably more >> >> spatter? Did you test a weld and did it seem as strong as with gas? >> > >> >More yes, but acceptable for what I needed it for. > >> And you can use anti-spatter spray to at least stop some of it >> sticking as much (apparently). > >I'm confused about this. If it stops spatter won't it effect the weld? Or >do you mask off an area before using? I've only used it on the nozzle and >found it very effective. I'm not sure but I guess the actual weld would burn it off whereas casual spatter near the weld may not do so so easily? I'm sure someone will be along to tell us. ;-) Cheers, T i m
From: Harry Bloomfield on 29 Jul 2010 16:10 T i m brought next idea : > It's mainly 3-5mm section steel (angle / box / plate) > so I guess either would be ok (MIG probably 'easier')? I would be using a stick welder on that. I only use MIG, where the stick would be just too aggressive and burn through the steel. -- Regards, Harry (M1BYT) (L) http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk
From: T i m on 29 Jul 2010 16:19 On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:10:13 +0100, Harry Bloomfield <harry.m1byt(a)NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk> wrote: >T i m brought next idea : >> It's mainly 3-5mm section steel (angle / box / plate) >> so I guess either would be ok (MIG probably 'easier')? > >I would be using a stick welder on that. I only use MIG, where the >stick would be just too aggressive and burn through the steel. Ok, thanks, time for some practice then. ;-) Cheers, T i m p.s. The half tonne braked trailer I built with the same stick welder over 30 years ago and has evolved a couple of times along the way is still going strong. ;-)
From: Rob on 30 Jul 2010 05:59
On 30/07/2010 6:10 AM, Harry Bloomfield wrote: > T i m brought next idea : >> It's mainly 3-5mm section steel (angle / box / plate) >> so I guess either would be ok (MIG probably 'easier')? > > I would be using a stick welder on that. I only use MIG, where the stick > would be just too aggressive and burn through the steel. > Gee I haven't used a stick welder for years now, the Mig is so much cleaner to weld with. Continuous wire feed, no stopping (provided you have a good duty cycle) no chipping slag, no more inclusions in the welds, less heat-less distortion, the flash is more shielded better on the eyes. Will never go back to using a stick. Just buy a decent MIG and use the correct gas for the material. I have a 180amp welder using Argoshield Universal and 0.8 wire. r |