Should I or shouldn't I?
in [UK Drivers]
|
Prev: Car detailed with Zaino
Next: Stitched up by a talivan
From: Alan Braggins on 9 Jul 2008 08:50 In article <VoednTie2d5g_-nVnZ2dnUVZ8qfinZ2d(a)bt.com>, Brimstone wrote: >> Technically this only >> proves that you are incapable of proving that you can answer the >> question, but that the reason for that is that you have no good >> answer is an obvious inference. > >Wrong. The only inference to be drawn is that I am unwilling to answer. It's obvious that your unwillingness is caused by your lack of a good answer. The reasons for this are so obvious that I refuse to explain them to you :-) (But as a hint, there is something you could do other than provide an answer that would change my mind. But I doubt you will.)
From: Brimstone on 9 Jul 2008 09:09 Alan Braggins wrote: > In article <VoednTie2d5g_-nVnZ2dnUVZ8qfinZ2d(a)bt.com>, Brimstone wrote: >>> Technically this only >>> proves that you are incapable of proving that you can answer the >>> question, but that the reason for that is that you have no good >>> answer is an obvious inference. >> >> Wrong. The only inference to be drawn is that I am unwilling to >> answer. > > It's obvious that your unwillingness is caused by your lack of a good > answer. An assumption without foundation. > The reasons for this are so obvious Another assumption. > that I refuse to explain > them to you :-) How can there be a refusal without a request?
From: Alan Braggins on 9 Jul 2008 12:59 In article <f-CdnX9kss8MJenVnZ2dnUVZ8umdnZ2d(a)bt.com>, Brimstone wrote: >Alan Braggins wrote: >> In article <VoednTie2d5g_-nVnZ2dnUVZ8qfinZ2d(a)bt.com>, Brimstone wrote: >>>> Technically this only >>>> proves that you are incapable of proving that you can answer the >>>> question, but that the reason for that is that you have no good >>>> answer is an obvious inference. >>> >>> Wrong. The only inference to be drawn is that I am unwilling to >>> answer. >> >> It's obvious that your unwillingness is caused by your lack of a good >> answer. > >An assumption without foundation. Not at all. An inference is not the same as an assumption, and if it was without foundation you could have disproved it by now, even without answering the original request. But you continue not to, and we continue to draw the obvious conclusion.
From: Brimstone on 9 Jul 2008 13:07 Alan Braggins wrote: > In article <f-CdnX9kss8MJenVnZ2dnUVZ8umdnZ2d(a)bt.com>, Brimstone wrote: >> Alan Braggins wrote: >>> In article <VoednTie2d5g_-nVnZ2dnUVZ8qfinZ2d(a)bt.com>, Brimstone >>> wrote: >>>>> Technically this only >>>>> proves that you are incapable of proving that you can answer the >>>>> question, but that the reason for that is that you have no good >>>>> answer is an obvious inference. >>>> >>>> Wrong. The only inference to be drawn is that I am unwilling to >>>> answer. >>> >>> It's obvious that your unwillingness is caused by your lack of a >>> good answer. >> >> An assumption without foundation. > > Not at all. An inference is not the same as an assumption, and if it > was without foundation you could have disproved it by now, even > without answering the original request. But you continue not to, and > we continue to draw the obvious conclusion. I'm not sure that you're even fully acquainted with all the facts and the reasons why I'm not prepared to give TC an answer. If you care to read the rest of the thread, carefully, you'll find it.
From: Ekul Namsob on 9 Jul 2008 13:22
Brimstone <brimstone520-ng03(a)yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Alan Braggins wrote: > > In article <VoednTie2d5g_-nVnZ2dnUVZ8qfinZ2d(a)bt.com>, Brimstone wrote: > >>> Technically this only > >>> proves that you are incapable of proving that you can answer the > >>> question, but that the reason for that is that you have no good > >>> answer is an obvious inference. > >> > >> Wrong. The only inference to be drawn is that I am unwilling to > >> answer. > > > > It's obvious that your unwillingness is caused by your lack of a good > > answer. > > An assumption without foundation. Plenty of foundation. Now, please be a tedious fool elsewhere. Cheers, Luke -- Red Rose Ramblings, the diary of an Essex boy in exile in Lancashire <http://www.shrimper.org.uk> |